Ref Watch

Paladin said:
If proof were ever needed of corruption, it's this. One of the purposes of VAR is to overturn incorrect refereeing decisions. If the referee or lineman thought Fernandes got a touch on the De Gea pass, VAR's job was to verify the touch. (Quite how they thought Fernandes touched the ball is another matter - they didn't see any deviation in the path of the ball after it went near to him).

So with all the camera angles available, they just need one that shows the touch from Fernandes. Have they found one yet? No. Was there one that the VAR saw that the rest of us didn't see? Probably not, but if there is such a clip showing the touch, let's see it now so we can put the debate to bed.

If they don't produce evidence of the Fernandes touch, then we know the decision was bent. Because without conclusive proof of the touch from Fernandes, the decision has to be offside, and the goal has to be cancelled.
Click to expand...
sky highlights on you tube show a clear angle that he doesnt touch it
 
Burtonblue said:
Was watching the game without volume but am not surprised at that **** Walton’s totally biased interpretation.
He never gives us anything.
Click to expand...
A wise decision. In fact listening to the Brighton fans overly giddy reaction to beating a ten man team with frankly bigger fish to fry in the coming days, and then later hearing Chelsea fans do the Madness thing, I'm starting to think football without fans isn't so bad after all.
 
Burtonblue said:
Was watching the game without volume but am not surprised at that **** Walton’s totally biased interpretation.
He never gives us anything.
Click to expand...

Brown envelope Walton.... how the hell does he gain employment after he was exposed for being on the take?
 
Burtonblue said:
Was watching the game without volume but am not surprised at that **** Walton’s totally biased interpretation.
He never gives us anything.
Click to expand...
I honestly don't think I've ever heard that twat walton ever say the decision should go City's way. He winds me up the ****, would love to meet him one day, preferably down a side street after dark.
 
Blueknows said:
look on sky premier highlights on you tube it clearly shows an angle that proves he doesnt touch it
Click to expand...
Not seen the replay but was this angle used for var ?
If not this was one of my previous posts regarding TV companies withholding replays for there own gain
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.