I worked for a regulated utility in the UK for forty years. As a privatised industry enjoying monopoly status in our area, we were heavily regulated. Auditors used to come along each year asking us to prove what we entered in our submissions was accurate. They could ask us anything, and we would have to give examples that verified our statements. This kept us honest.
The trouble with PGMOL and VAR is that they are their own regulators. They are accountable to nobody but themselves, with Webb being the top man, gradually weeding out those who don't toe the line or are incompetent (Swarbrick, Dean), and replacing them with his trusted allies (Moss). They are becoming an organisation with a dictator, assisted by cronies and yes men.
Webb has had a year to bed in now. He is talking about releasing VAR conversations for certain incidents, to demonstrate the transparency they claim to want. Which incidents though? Those chosen by Webb himself, because they will not be controversial.
This is not good enough. Coupled with the PGMOL statement today in response to Dean's revelation, we have an organisation that looks increasingly unfit for purpose.
They could build bridges and start to restore confidence immediately with some simple measures:
1. All VAR conversations for the duration of each game to be recorded and stored.
2. Create a team of independent auditors (experienced sports people from other sports, with no allegiances), tasked with reviewing all controversial incidents.
3. Webb to review on TV certain VAR incidents, but chosen based on public perception of the decision, not Webb's selected incidents.
If these charlatans know their conversations and decisions might enter the public domain, you can guarantee things like the Wolves penalty, the Rashford offside would have different, more reasonable outcomes and PGMOL apologies would be significantly reduced.