Eh, no.
He's a corrupt **** who simply loves the attention.
You can show your support by not voting for him to eat a kangaroo's bollocks on TV later this year if you want I'm sure.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ref Watch
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
He's a corrupt **** who simply loves the attention.
You can show your support by not voting for him to eat a kangaroo's bollocks on TV later this year if you want I'm sure.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,565
Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 16,319
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Yeah hopefully PGMOL will throw the book at him, Make an example, so other refs fear saying anything negative about var... way to go if you want a closed shop.Eh, no.
He's a corrupt **** who simply loves the attention.
You can show your support by not voting for him to eat a kangaroo's bollocks on TV later this year if you want I'm sure.
He basically a whistle blower. Lol
MCC
Well-Known Member
Anyone know the average amount of time added on in PL games so far? I bet It's less than the community shield.
Despite all the posturing over the years from Mike Dean I would imagine he is quite a clever man, so why would he relate this incident. At the time he never had to give an explanation as to why he did not involve VAR, just the same as the Rashford incident and more so the Wolves penalty. Silence is golden. Is he tipping us off about manipulation from higher levels?
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,581
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Despite all the posturing over the years from Mike Dean I would imagine he is quite a clever man, so why would he relate this incident. At the time he never had to give an explanation as to why he did not involve VAR, just the same as the Rashford incident and more so the Wolves penalty. Silence is golden. Is he tipping us off about manipulation from higher levels?
Doubt that this is going to be an alert to the situation which exists as I suspect that the majority of football supporters don't trust the PiGMOL officials, and believe that certain decisions and outcomes are contrived to achieve " desired results" for a number of dubious decisions.
Helping out a colleague who has fucked up a decision in order to protect their " integrity " seems perfectly reasonable and acceptable.
After all, what is the correct result for the teams playing got to do with it ?
Last edited:
How's he a whistle blower when he's not said PGMOL made him do it, he just made the decision himself because he's a bent ****Yeah hopefully PGMOL will throw the book at him, Make an example, so other refs fear saying anything negative about var... way to go if you want a closed shop.
He basically a whistle blower. Lol
AKA 55 year old teenager
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2022
- Messages
- 302
- Team supported
- City
I noticed that as well. The expression on his face looked like his mother has just died.I appreciate that the job of the refs is to ensure that the cash cows keep the money rolling in, but just watching last season's Season Review and our game vs the rags. If you ever needed an example of the extent to which Michael Oliver despises this club, take a look at his face when he has to confirm that our 2nd goal has crossed the line. Pure hatred and it is clearly personal. Should never be allowed anywhere near our games.
1961_vintage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 15,331
Ha ha proper laugh out loud reaction to that.How's he a whistle blower when he's not said PGMOL made him do it, he just made the decision himself because he's a bent ****
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
they should ask "what about when you're not on VAR is that you're fault as well "