Ref Watch

kaz7 said:
Ha,you do know spain will be watching and they know what a **** he is and what the blood is like between him and pep and we know as does pep and the team
Click to expand...
Lol. The CL final is one of the most watched events on the planet, there isn't a grand plan to try and gain more viewers by appointing a ref that 99.99% of people don't know and have never heard of. We've also won 75% if the games he's reffed. You've managed to drill yourself into a wormhole of paranoia
 
Eoiyflem said:
Lol. The CL final is one of the most watched events on the planet, there isn't a grand plan to try and gain more viewers by appointing a ref that 99.99% of people don't know and have never heard of. We've also won 75% if the games he's reffed. You've managed to drill yourself into a wormhole of paranoia
Click to expand...
Lol
 
LangleyBlue1970 said:
Fans of clubs will always say things like that. A side subject, look at RAWK. They ask why the media never calls us out on our spending, yet on here it’s all the media says. It’s the same with ref performances. Each clubs fans think they are screwed. Interestingly, those same fans in rawk think we are favoured.
It’s all about fans perception of their club.
The facts are there. He’s reffed us 4 times. We’ve won 3. In a one of game the ref won’t matter. But the go to on here to blame the ref 2 weeks before the team even flys out!
Click to expand...

yes I see all that and I see this referee when refereeing is a complete balloon it’s like pep said he see the obvious and gives the opposite.. just because we win with him refereeing us doesn’t mean he is a good referee..
 
There‘s obviously a conflict of interests with the ref and having Pep call him out on a few things, leaving him with a bruised ego will not help matters.
 
I recognised him straight away.

The worst ref for City in the World.

One thing is that he won’t be able to get away with as much with VAR. I know people will say that’s biased too but nothing like this guy.

Hadn‘t occurred to me UEFA would do this. Typical.
 
Eoiyflem said:
Lol. The CL final is one of the most watched events on the planet, there isn't a grand plan to try and gain more viewers by appointing a ref that 99.99% of people don't know and have never heard of. We've also won 75% if the games he's reffed. You've managed to drill yourself into a wormhole of paranoia
Click to expand...
Those wormholes have served me well in the past. No need to chuck 'em just yet. If Seńor Nine Peseta Note refs according to THE written version of the LotG currently held in the safe at Ewing Towers and Sterling gets every pen for every foul then it might be time to reconsider, but until then I'll just hang on to 'em.
 
LangleyBlue1970 said:
Another with that English fighting spirit.
He’s reffed us 4 times. Won 3, lost one. 9 yellows in those games. The site I’m on I can’t tell if that’s for us or the game.

he’s reffed Chelsea twice. Lost one, won one. 7 yellows in those two games.

stats can be read how you want them, but the fact is we have won 3 of our games under him. And do you really think he will make deliberate errors to ensure we are done over - in front of the entire football world live on global telly?
If we are good enough we will win. And it is that simple.
Stop with the excuses and down trodden attitude.
Click to expand...
Yes, Like Pep said, this ref makes the opposite decision in the right moment.

Football is so subjective that that sort of thing happens, Sterling didnt get a penalty the other day but we all know it was a pen, that moment would have brought us back into the game (I dont think that was corrupt in any way though), but its totally possible to alter the flow of a game with any major decision in what is a subjective situation.

The games that this ref does for us, the important games, the important decisions, have been suspect and in fact just plain wrong. He has a knack of doing it and his only saving grace is that he appears to be shit at his job anyway, which in turn begs the question why UEFA selected him! But I suppose its different rules and requirements for UEFA refs which would be fair enough
 
Gorton_Tubster said:
Yes, Like Pep said, this ref makes the opposite decision in the right moment.

Football is so subjective that that sort of thing happens, Sterling didnt get a penalty the other day but we all know it was a pen, that moment would have brought us back into the game (I dont think that was corrupt in any way though), but its totally possible to alter the flow of a game with any major decision in what is a subjective situation.

The games that this ref does for us, the important games, the important decisions, have been suspect and in fact just plain wrong. He has a knack of doing it and his only saving grace is that he appears to be shit at his job anyway, which in turn begs the question why UEFA selected him! But I suppose its different rules and requirements for UEFA refs which would be fair enough
Click to expand...
I think I know why he’s been appointed and I’m not one for conspiracies at all.

They really don’t want us to win it. Very difficult now.

Blatant indirect message from UEFA to the officials.
 
Ribchester said:
The best thing about this particular specimen is his space awareness at cutting off most of our quick passes around the outside of the penalty area is poor. He is nowhere near the high standards set by Taylor and his colleagues.
Click to expand...
He can't hold a Dipper candle to Lee Mason nor Jonny One Lung!
 
Lahoz is one of those refs who always wants to be the centre of attention , sending off high profile managers feeds his ego , you do not notice good refs in games , but every time i have watched a match with this **** in the middle he makes controversial decisions and books players on a whim. Worst possible ref for the final he will try to make it all about him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top