Ref Watch

[Vic]

So, by your own definition, an on field review is appropriate. What is/isn't a foul comes under "subjective decision".

That's not what it says.

 

[Daz-Simp]

That's not what it says.

Yes, it does, falls under "intensity of a foul challenge". In addition, it also says that OFR should be used for a match changing decision late on, which this was.

 

[Vic]

Yes, it does, falls under "intensity of a foul challenge". In addition, it also says that OFR should be used for a match changing decision late on, which this was.

Intensity of a foul challenge is for whether it's Serious Foul Play or not.

 

[blue b4 the moon]

Alty just shit, how many times can Antonio go down?

As for both pens, he's shit enough to miss them but VAR should be giving both, even the one we got VAR has to ask him to look at it.

 

[Blue Mist]

It was our decimated defence that meant we didn’t pick up all the points today. Not the referee.
Still in our hands.

At nil nil it was in our hands. Give us the penalty, Taylor/var and it changes the game.... if we (cough) score the bloody thing that is.
Yes the defence was decimated but we need fairness and honesty from refs.

 

[eyalluvitt]

Alty just shit, how many times can Antonio go down?

As for both pens, he's shit enough to miss them but VAR should be giving both, even the one we got VAR has to ask him to look at it.

He was looking straight at the 2nd pen, a stonewaller if ever there was one and he still had to have his arm twisted by VAR to give it. Dreadful bias and incompetence.

 

[Vic]

Intensity of a foul challenge is for whether it's Serious Foul Play or not.

Apparently the "premier league shareholders" make the rules about the referee going to look at the monitor. Given how high a bar they've set for "clear and obvious" the referee going to look at the monitor is a time-wasting formality.

VAR: Referee Review Area explained

www.premierleague.com

 

[deano ou812]

they got away not giving the first one which was a stonewall pen,the ref tried to get away from giving the second and once VAR looked at it they had to give it as it was far and away a stonewall pen,they would have been found out if they hadn’t of given that second one and even hard line non believer’s of match fixing and corruption would be hard pushed not to see what they are trying to do …

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

At nil nil it was in our hands. Give us the penalty, Taylor/var and it changes the game.... if we (cough) score the bloody thing that is.
Yes the defence was decimated but we need fairness and honesty from refs.

Not asking for much are you ?

When have PiGMOL reps ever provided those characteristics ?

 

[eyalluvitt]

they got away not giving the first one which was a stonewall pen,the ref tried to get away from giving the second and once VAR looked at it they had to give it as it was far and away a stonewall pen,they would have been found out if they hadn’t of given that second one and even hard line non believer’s of match fixing and corruption would be hard pushed not to see what they are trying to do …

I think they can easily not give both, nobody in the media would highlight it. Rival fans would just laugh. We would be furious but we would just be pissing into the wind of anti City corruption.