You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ref Watch
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,190
Only 3 cards for them, yet there were about 8 potential yellows against Mahrez alone.
Some of those decisions were NOT MADE BY THE ON FIELD REFEREE.
2 of them after 90 minutes.
again the decision was right (by the laws of the game).
The laws of the game need ammending.....he interfered with play but not in the way the laws state you have to to be ofside.....Ie by blocking a defender or by trying to play the ball...of which he did neither
Yeah I stopped reading when you said it was right.
Enjoy being a contrary and wrong fucker for the rest of the day.
It WAS NOT a piss-poor performance.
Correct but this what you expect from a none city fan coming on here to take the piss!
SebastianBlue
President, International Julian Alvarez Fan Club
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 57,036
Complete inability to defend?Winging about refs does not explain the piss poor performances- 1 shot today and once again completely inability to defend
We conceded two goals: one was egregiously offside (no team can defend that farce) and then another right after when all the momentum had completely shifted to United (and even then Eddie was unlucky not to prevent it). Apart from that we handled everything they threw at us.
These takes are getting more and more ridiculously by the week.
kippaxwill
Well-Known Member
Completely disagree he's run after the ball to within about a centimetre of it shaping up to shoot before Fernandes takes it away from him.again the decision was right (by the laws of the game).
The laws of the game need ammending.....he interfered with play but not in the way the laws state you have to to be ofside.....Ie by blocking a defender or by trying to play the ball...of which he did neither
simon23
Well-Known Member
As always with you you just cant handle us losing....toys out of pram.Yeah I stopped reading when you said it was right.
Enjoy being a contrary and wrong fucker for the rest of the day.
the rule is wrong...the refs interpritation or that wrong rule in this instance is correct as neither the ball is played by Rashford nor does he impede a city defender.
Take it on the chin
In a world where having toe offside is scrutinised by VAR and is considered to be gaining an advantage. Moving towards the ball a basically shielding in from the goalkeeper and defenders is apparently ok. Corruption in plain sight
Complete inability to defend?
We conceded two goals: one was egregiously offside (no team can defend that farce) and then another right after when all the momentum had completely shifted to United (and even then Eddie was unlucky to prevent it). Apart from that we handled everything they threw at us.
These takes are getting more and more ridiculously by the week.
Forum is full of non City fans normally, tonight will be even worse.
Best of luck pal, you will need it.