Wow, thanks man.It was from "blatent" until var got involved, but I think you're just being cuntrary now, so I'm going elsewhere for the night, happy wumming.
Not the point it would of been given.Had it not been given at the other end would you have been happy with the decision? As I definitely wouldn’t.
All of them.Oh fuck off how many were let go today until it didn't suit.
VAR has been around for about 5 years.
If you pull a shirt of an opponent, you run the risk of being penalised.
It absolutely is a howler when compared to how much else he let go in the game.Fair enough blue. I’m not going to labour the point. I can see why it was disallowed and don’t have a huge issue with it. I don’t think it’s a howler of a decision.
:-) sorry hadn't spotted the typo in my post wasn't meant that way.Wow, thanks man.
Just after I respond to someone else saying I’m not going to labour the point.
I’ll resist from calling you what you should be called for this message and bid you good night.
About 20 mins having given the most knee jerk a good 5-6 hours to calm down!:-) sorry hadn't spotted the typo in my post wasn't meant that way.
However your "not going to labour the point" was after my post, and lets face it a bit ironic, as you had been "labouring the point" for quite a while ;-)
Ok, I disagree, but to each their own.It absolutely is a howler when compared to how much else he let go in the game.
What year do you reckon that will happen?Yeah let's keep on getting screwed over there and accept it, fuck that call it out for what it is and maybe just maybe we'll actually get a decisive decision at that shit hole.
They're not called influencers for nothing pal.What year do you reckon that will happen?
What we say on here has zero effect on refereeing performances at Anfield!
Ok, well I hope you DM the right influencers on Insta to get VAR changed.In in
They're not called influencers for nothing pal.
In the context of the whole game that VAR decision was an abomination, and the point you made above reference the referral of fouls is PRECICELY the reason that VAR in its current guise is NOT fit for purpose.The bad decisions have been there 40 years.
In the time VAR has been there how many more clear & obvious fouls / handballs for goals have been disallowed for LFC & im specifically talking handling it by TAA.
The VAR clip was shown from after the Fabinho foul on Haaland & in super slow mo which exaggerated the shirt pull.
It wasn’t a clear & obvious error & shouldn’t have been referred to VAR, especially when the referee has decided I’m not awarding free kicks. That means the advantage is for the defender to foul & never referred to VAR but the attacker is.
It’s bollox AHT & next year we’ll talk about our bad record there & it will happen again.
After 60 mins we’d been given 1 free kick.
Yeah let's keep on getting screwed over there and accept it, fuck that call it out for what it is and maybe just maybe we'll actually get a decisive decision at that shit hole.
Problem is some of our fans seem quite content to keep getting screwed over there.Believe me social media is a powerful tool.
It's not fit for purpose.Ok, well I hope you DM the right influencers on Insta to get VAR changed.
Good luck!
I've said it numerous times: Taylor was NOT in charge of that game.At the time I thought it was all fair to chalk it off due to an obvious quick shirt grab... despite it being soft. But.. when you watch it over Fabinho crashes into Haaland, first his knee makes contact with the big man with absolutely no contact with the ball.. this challenge makes him engage in a battle, he’s off balance, so grabs his shirt to gain control of the situation.
Both are very, very minor infringements, but Fabinho’s knee is the fist infringement.. my point is it’s a complete 50/50 tussle that the ref has had an excellent view off.. and he clearly waved it on.. yet it was reviewed as a clear and obvious mistake by the ref. It really wasn’t.
I've said it numerous times: Taylor was NOT in charge of that game.