I’m sure the Ref only got shown the Harland partAt the time I thought it was all fair to chalk it off due to an obvious quick shirt grab... despite it being soft. But.. when you watch it over Fabinho crashes into Haaland, first his knee makes contact with the big man with absolutely no contact with the ball.. this challenge makes him engage in a battle, he’s off balance, so grabs his shirt to gain control of the situation.
Both are very, very minor infringements, but Fabinho’s knee is the fist infringement.. my point is it’s a complete 50/50 tussle that the ref has had an excellent view off.. and he clearly waved it on.. yet it was reviewed as a clear and obvious mistake by the ref. It really wasn’t.
Thread bans are now being considered, so please leave it or take it to PM's.Children, please go to bed.
Listen we're all blues some more than others me especially more than you with your scouse tenancies, so if you don't want to take it private keep quiet okay.If you’ve spotted, messages have been deleted. It‘s because you’ve been abusive and threatened violence. I‘d assume a ban of some sort will come your way if you don’t desist.
No. I’ll call it how I see it. That doesn’t make me a bigger or lesser blue than you. That’s how forums work.Listen we're all blues some more than others me especially more than you with your scouse tenancies, so if you don't want to take it private keep quiet okay.
Let's just take this private.No. I’ll call it how I see it. That doesn’t make me a bigger or lesser blue than you. That’s how forums work.
They don’t work when you try to shut down debate by being abusive or offering straighteners.
Let‘s be civil and debate what we have seen.
Please stop, I've better things to do.Listen we're all blues some more than others me especially more than you with your scouse tenancies, so if you don't want to take it private keep quiet okay.
Amen.Let‘s be civil and debate what we have seen.
But you do seem to really like posting in a way to wind people up and then complain when you get the expected response. You've said 'Night' a few times, maybe call it one?No. I’ll call it how I see it. That doesn’t make me a bigger or lesser blue than you. That’s how forums work.
They don’t work when you try to shut down debate by being abusive or offering straighteners.
Let‘s be civil and debate what we have seen.
Fair.But you do seem to really like posting in a way to wind people up and then complain when you get the expected response. You've said 'Night' a few times, maybe call it one?
Off you pop sweetheartFair.
Night.
Night Divok xOff you pop sweetheart
Probably didn’t.. my point being where does it stop? And where does it start? You could probably find a minor infringement in the build up to 90% of goals if you look close enough. But if you are splitting hairs.. Fabinho’s knee made the initial contact with Haaland today.. that was the first foul if you’re re reffing the game..I’m sure the Ref only got shown the Harland part
He didn’t see the original bit of Fabinho fouling 1st on the Var when he went over to the screen
Making the refs original decision right 6 of 1 6 of another
Its cos AHT has gone to bed, oh hang on....Glad we are all friends again :-)
So a foul isn't a foul unless a goal is scored then it becomes a foul even if the referee decided it wasn't a foul as he didn't know at the point of the foul that a goal would be scored later on?Not at all. This one mattered, the others didn’t as they didn’t effect in a goal.
When a goal is scored, there are now checks to see if there has been a foul in the build up. This changed when VAR came in.So a foul isn't a foul unless a goal is scored then it becomes a foul even if the referee decided it wasn't a foul as he didn't know at the point of the foul that a goal would be scored later on?
Is this what the sport has now become?