Referees/Officials 2017/18 performances

Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s only the same call as we got from the linesman against Newcastle though...

I agree that I don’t think the linesman can make it, but it’s something that we have benefitted from in the past too so I just see it as a poor decision rather than anything corrupt
 
There's fucking tons of it, and when it's presented you say it's not, you choose to ignore it, that's your right, but like the other troll stop telling others they're wrong for accepting it as it is.

Why are we trolls because we do not view things the same as you?

Its a different viewpoint to yours. Why can we not just debate the topic and cut out the insults.
 
I question Mason`s integrity. We don`t like him, and he clearly doesn`t like us. We have outed him, he holds a grudge, and this is his way of getting his own back.
Either that or his just shit. But if that was the case he`d be shit for both teams in the City games he officiates.
Don't give that twunt the complement of a 'grudge' the guy is just absolute shite at his job - he should be stood down permanently- prat of the first order
 
and since then ther have been several potential leg breakers against us not given, perhaps you'd like to point out similarities for other teams?

Or does the debatable offside Silva goal equal out a line and call for a ball going out noted from forty metres out whilst the ball was ten metres in the air, completely fair assessment that disallowed a goal.

You’re also making strawmen here. I’m not comparing the leg breakers you mention with the “Silva goal” [sic], I was merely answering a specific question about decisions that have gone our way.
 
I admire your stance here Ric, but no matter what the reasons are, that goal should stand, even if Sane was in an offside position, because under the current rules Sane is entitled to be there, and he made no attempt to go near the ball, and Mason knew that, which was why he originally gave the goal. He wanted a reason not to give it, to keep a big game for the TV broadcasters and sponsors open, so for me he went over to make it look like he'd taken advice. The replays show Sane is not offside anyway, so it should be a goal, and annoyingly one of our best goals of the season will never be counted.

As for the rest of Mason's performance, well you can view it however you want, but at the very best it was incompetent, and if not its something else, which most football fans don't want to believe happens, even though deep down we know it does, as Halsey and Clattenburg have both confirmed recently.

The good thing is now, 90% of the time they can try and stop us with decisions, but we're too good, so rather than let them spoil it for me, I'm going to take every win we get, when clearly there were efforts to stop us winning today as a bigger success, and I'll be sticking the 2 fingers up to it all, and continue to enjoy what we are doing.

When officials with certain known allegiances (Mason and Taylor in particular) are stopped from being involved in games that could involve the team they have an allegiance too, then I will know there is nothing sinister going on, until then I won't.
Nail on head, the ref and Lino are miked up, there's no reason at all to go over , except to discuss how they could prevent the goal.
 
Regardless of whether he was inline of sight or not, he wasn't offside

No he wasn't.

We have it was disallowed for offside which it wasnt and we have it was disallowed because he was interfering with play which again he wasn't.

At least they got together to get their stories straight i suppose.........
 
Must have been at least 4 or 5 leg breaking tackles on our players recently and the refs are doing nothing , it appears when the neanderthals play us it is a free hit , they can just go out and try to maim our players with impunity , not sure how serious Sane's injury was but it was a horrendous tackle and a straight red card all day long , Mason is a c*nt
 
I admire your stance here Ric, but no matter what the reasons are, that goal should stand, even if Sane was in an offside position, because under the current rules Sane is entitled to be there, and he made no attempt to go near the ball, and Mason knew that, which was why he originally gave the goal. He wanted a reason not to give it, to keep a big game for the TV broadcasters and sponsors open, so for me he went over to make it look like he'd taken advice. The replays show Sane is not offside anyway, so it should be a goal, and annoyingly one of our best goals of the season will never be counted.

As for the rest of Mason's performance, well you can view it however you want, but at the very best it was incompetent, and if not its something else, which most football fans don't want to believe happens, even though deep down we know it does, as Halsey and Clattenburg have both confirmed recently.

The good thing is now, 90% of the time they can try and stop us with decisions, but we're too good, so rather than let them spoil it for me, I'm going to take every win we get, when clearly there were efforts to stop us winning today as a bigger success, and I'll be sticking the 2 fingers up to it all, and continue to enjoy what we are doing.

When officials with certain known allegiances (Mason and Taylor in particular) are stopped from being involved in games that could involve the team they have an allegiance too, then I will know there is nothing sinister going on, until then I won't.

Well said mate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.