The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
Sane did against Spurs, or is it only if it's the last touch of the ball?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
slicky202
Well-Known Member
Isn't it crazy that the half time punditry consisted of,how dare the referee give a correct decision for the foul on stones. The ref could of said he didn't see it and decided not to take the opportunity to screw us. Chuckle was furious.
Agree, strange the ref being criticised by the pundits for giving a correct decision because he couldn't have seen it. BizarreIsn't it crazy that the half time punditry consisted of,how dare the referee give a correct decision for the foul on stones. The ref could of said he didn't see it and decided not to take the opportunity to screw us. Chuckle was furious.
2 great examples this weekend why technology won't help:
1. The France/Scotland rugby - France "try" goes to TMO. All the commentators saying defo try. TMO says no try and actually gets the rule wrong when disallowing
2. Howard Webb in the Times today re sanchez handball - he said he would have allowed it
Technology introduces more, rather than replaces, flawed human subjectivity. And whilst it does, we get further away from the purest form of the game.
it's a "no" from me.
Howard Webb is why video refereeing won't work. He said that Navas got fouled in the penalty area against Everton a year or so ago but it was a good decision by the ref not to give a penalty because he went down a funny way.
He is the type that would be a video ref. Probably even run the video ref department.
As I said earlier the last touch is the one that counts.Sane did against Spurs, or is it only if it's the last touch of the ball?
Hamann Pineapple
Well-Known Member
This is what worries me about video refereeing, who decides which angles to replay, SKY ?Isn't it crazy that the half time punditry consisted of,how dare the referee give a correct decision for the foul on stones. The ref could of said he didn't see it and decided not to take the opportunity to screw us. Chuckle was furious.
Mid Wales blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,782
Pretty sure it was Zidane who gave the nod.He's not supposed to, I think there was a huge decision in the world cup(maybe Zidane?) where the 4th official gave the ref the nod
Gordyola
Well-Known Member
Agree, strange the ref being criticised by the pundits for giving a correct decision because he couldn't have seen it. Bizarre
How the hell can they claim that he couldn't see it Was he looking the other way NO could they see the direction he was looking at from the pictures they shown NO Having shown the foul clearly then there was no need to go over it again and again