es1
Well-Known Member
JoeMercer'sWay said:eshiers1 said:JoeMercer'sWay said:I'd done my basic referees course a couple months before and watching it back felt that Chamakh kicked the ball towards Hart in a way that Boyata didn't influence because he hadn't made contact yet and to me Chamakh panicked and lost the ball before Boyata made contact.
To me you have to ask if they'd both stayed on their feet would Chamakh have had a clear goalscoring opportunity, and to me he wouldn't, for one Boyata was still closing him down and he wasn't even in the box when the incident took place.
I'm a ref, i said it at the time i'd send him off and i stand by that
i think its a clear goalscoring opportunity and therefore a red...but herein lies the probelm with refs! say we were 2 prem refs, had two similar incidents we could both handle them completely differently based on our own judgement!
The only reason I'd send him off is if I was at an angle that I couldn't see Chamakh's touch before the tackle.
Even then, I'd get it rescinded and hold my hands up and admit that in my mind I'd made a mistake.
I don't see how Chamakh can have a shot if he's kicked the ball to Hart before the tackle, you can argue Boyata influenced him but Chamakh could have kicked it straight on and gone down and I'd have been more inclined to give it.
i can see you're reasoning, but in my mind boyata prevents a clear goal scoring opportunity, had the challenge not been made chamakh would have been clean through as he was goal side of boyata (i'm going off memory here)