Appreciate this. Am also curious - for me, Life does not contain just the predictable and repeatable but also the unpredictable and unrepeatable. Perhaps for now we could give the latter role to 'art.' In this sense it may be the union of these two aspects that brings one closer to Truth? I'd kind of wonder if this could also be termed the relationship ofWell it produces the most reliability with the least amount of chaos.
The scientific method is badly understood most of the time, but it can be best summed up by two phrases - predictable and repeatable. Every hypothesis has to be able to pass those caveats; it must predict an event and then produce that event in such a way that others can replicate it. This is the democratisation of the human experience, you have to be able to replicate my findings and vice versa, it requires no "trust" in people. People are generally the thing that causes most of the problems in science.
It's why we call it the best as every experiment is self evidently true when shown to be true and if somebody disagrees then they follow the process and see if it is replicated.
There's many thinkers who look at weaknesses within the scientific method and like any model it does have a few. However like the saying goes about capitalism, it's not perfect, it's just better than all of the alternatives.
orthodox and unorthodox. Or maybe masculine and feminine.
As for trust I have experienced different kinds - one is more like trying to trust which is dependent on other people, the other more like a felt sense of inner trust that I am free to choose or not regardless of other people. Nothing wrong with the former but have tended to find the latter more useful in dealing with the unpredictable/unrepeatable in Life. Who knows - maybe this trust has a part to play in uniting science and art, free market and central government etc etc?
Edit : am now wondering if there is a kind of trust that requires something else to be distrusted eg I trust science but distrust art. Perhaps there is a kind of trust that could embrace both - maybe not so much as opposites but points along a fluid scale. Each is free where to be on that scale at each moment...?
Last edited: