How can you disprove the God of the Bible if you don’t understand the Bible? The problem I’ve seen consistently with this thread is people thinking they’ve got it all figured out when they’ve blatantly not read it, and if they have read it they’ve not read it enough to understand it. If you’re going to try and disprove Christianity, Islam or Judaism you need to at least know the religious books of these faiths inside out.
Why do you think the Abrahamic Christian God is the easiest to dismiss? I’d actually argue the fact that Jesus very likely existed historically and the fact Muhammad did definitely, it gives those to faiths more credence. How you disprove them is inconsistencies across scripture and getting a sound argument together to pinpoint the inconsistencies.
Roman, Pagan and Greek Gods are the easiest to disprove, as they often claim there’s a god for each natural event that we know isn’t true.
We’re on two different pages alright, you think Matt Dillahunty debating that Jordan Peterson is worth any time whatsoever. The reason these people don’t debate scholars is because they’d get embarrassed.
Non Christian scholars debate each other all the time, the reason is they may disagree on particular claims made in the New Testament.
