Len Rum
Well-Known Member
That's not the point. It' s up to the 'believers' to prove that there is a God.RP2 said:chabal said:stiofanob said:Not intelligence as such but I don't like the whole stereotype of science against religion. ( I'm a final year student in Theoretical Physics and Maths)
I'm not "stick to the holy text" religious, but I believe in something bring out there.
What annoys me is people who call themselves scientists "disproving" God by saying that the big bang created the universe and not God.
What they fall to realise is that the big bang is just how the universe came to be as we know it now. Something had to be there for there to be a big bang.. and where did that come from?
I.e what fuelled the explosion and, what set the fuse?
There may have been something before the Big Bang but if it is proposed that this "thing" is god then it doesn't help us. It simply provokes the question who or what created god.
God is never a reasonable answer in these circumstances.
Quite true, but similarly, people claiming there is NO God because the big bang created the universe are equally unhelpful.
There is no proof whatsoever that there is, or isn't, a God. There are arguments for both, but no definitive answer.
" What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof."