Return of Supporters

dannybcity said:
Doing feck all? Let's have it right. The club wanted a straight ballot with Cityzen card holders getting twice as many tickets. CM negotiated that down to increase the seasoncards in the ballot.

I encourage people to express their dissatisfaction at the club. Please email me daniel.bowdler@citymatters.co.uk, I've not had one yet.

But too many people seem too willing to blame the City Matters volunteers for decisions made by the people on six figure salaries at the club.
Click to expand...
Incoming
 
I have to say i’m quite surprised any tickets have gone to Cityzens card holders over ST holders.
 
Corky said:
Despite the ballot information earlier this week giving a print at home option, the email they send says it is now phone only entry.

Also they sent the health questionnaire to your phone too, good luck with that.
Click to expand...
The club's official covid code of conduct still has this :

Print@Home or Mobile Tickets only. We will not be issuing access cards or paper tickets at this time. Tickets will be issued as either mobile tickets or Print@Home tickets. Please ensure that you print your ticket(s) in advance or, if using a mobile ticket, that your mobile phone is charged.

Manchester City COVID-19 Supporter Code of Conduct

www.mancity.com www.mancity.com
 
WNRH said:
Understand the sentiment but that was 23 years ago. You could say the same for those that attended in 2006-07.

You can’t define loyalty by how long you have been going, it’s unfair on the younger generation.

I think some fans have to accept now in 2021 for games that have limited tickets such as this one or away games that there is a much bigger demand now with our expanded fan base and you may not be able to go every game and is it fair that you do go to every away game?

It shouldn’t matter how much you have spent or how long you have been going, a change of circumstances in life could happen to you and should that then be it for your chance of ever seeing the team at an away game again because you have dropped down the que?
Click to expand...

You make some good points and whatever system that is used will always disappoint somebody.

I used 1998/99 as an example because that was a time the club pleaded for us not to desert them. We really were on the bones of our arse and remember back then the chances of a new rich owner coming in was as likely as it was of us ever winning a trophy again. Although for the bigger games the attendance could swell to capacity in reality it was a hardcore of 28,000 that kept the club going through thin and thinner. As you say that was 22 years ago so sadly a fair few of those 28,000 won't be with us anymore.

For domestic cup finals and home league games almost everyone who wants a ticket usually gets one of you're a season card holder or cityzen. For away league games with only 3,000 fans then yes some have to go to younger fans as they'll never catch up with the older fans on top of the pile. One thing that should come out of the ESL fiasco is supporters of both clubs in the final of the champions league should get more tickets. Finals should also be held in larger stadiums that are accessible for people to get to, not some tiny little ground in the back of beyond

In years to come as virtual reality improves beyond our wildest dreams I feel watching it on such will be almost the same as being at the game so will become more popular and may even replace travelling to games for many fans
 
People seem to think that City Matters have a major voice on what happens. I think that they try their best to make things fair, but when fans are involved, the definition of fairness will be different for each individual member.

They could all agree that something is bad and the club not take heed of that advice.

They're on a hiding to nothing really, but they put themselves forward to try to make a difference.
 
paulchapo said:
You make some good points and whatever system that is used will always disappoint somebody.

I used 1998/99 as an example because that was a time the club pleaded for us not to desert them. We really were on the bones of our arse and remember back then the chances of a new rich owner coming in was as likely as it was of us ever winning a trophy again. Although for the bigger games the attendance could swell to capacity in reality it was a hardcore of 28,000 that kept the club going through thin and thinner. As you say that was 22 years ago so sadly a fair few of those 28,000 won't be with us anymore.

For domestic cup finals and home league games almost everyone who wants a ticket usually gets one of you're a season card holder or cityzen. For away league games with only 3,000 fans then yes some have to go to younger fans as they'll never catch up with the older fans on top of the pile. One thing that should come out of the ESL fiasco is supporters of both clubs in the final of the champions league should get more tickets. Finals should also be held in larger stadiums that are accessible for people to get to, not some tiny little ground in the back of beyond

In years to come as virtual reality improves beyond our wildest dreams I feel watching it on such will be almost the same as being at the game so will become more popular and may even replace travelling to games for many fans
Click to expand...
So go with the system where less people will be disappointed.

Tickets have be distributed on loyalty points for ages I've utterly no idea why this has changed now. Would anyone have been up in arms had they followed that distribution again?

I get the point where we need young blood as I go to the games now at 45 and still feel the youngest there. So, make it full on ballot and give people a run up to the change - throwing this in for Sergio's last game/title lift after a unprecedented global pandemic is ludicrous.
 
For those lucky ones with a ticket - have a fantastic day out and say goodbye to Sergio from all of us not there.

I have been a season ticket holder since 1987, and home and away for over 30 years - including Lokeren, Poznan, and even that pointless game at Santander in 2008. I worked in New York for a few years and flew back for most games. I even missed a promotion discussion with my boss to get to Birmingham to watch us lose 2-1 in December 1997. And I am a London Blue, so have a life-long neck ache from staring at the departures board at Euston waiting for the platform number to come up.

I have missed family events, holidays and business meetings - like most of us - to follow this football club, but even I have only got 19,000 points, so will be ticketless (although an email telling me that for sure would be nice).

So I am not here to gripe, or point fingers at City Matters (who I am sure try their best), but I do think this whole thing has been managed by a group of brain dead gerbils. Why was it not either points OR a ballot? Doing this weird hybrid thing has just pissed everybody off.

I know we need to make sure new younger fans get the opportunity to go to restricted ticket games, but this was a meaningless, dead rubber game that the Club could have sentimentally decided should have been done on points - just as a thank you and recognition to the loyalty of us Legacy fans (given the kicking we've had with the ESL).

A controversial point - but I honestly think that the 'in the moment' live match day experience matters more to fans like us possibly, than some of the newbies, who have been bought up on wall to wall TV football. Happy to be told I am talking bollocks.

Final worry. I am terrified of what the Club are going to do with the Porto allocation - surely they have to get that right?

For those going, young and old, enjoy every second.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.