Richards

Status
Not open for further replies.
aguero93:20 said:
I'm no cynic said:
leighton said:
Only team I can see coming in for him is QPR and knowing Harry it will be a last minute deal on the deal line for peanuts.
Click to expand...
If there is one club out there who would get a deal moving by paying his wage, full whack, it's QPR. Your guess is as good as any yet made!
Click to expand...
Isla to QPR makes that one unlikely.
Click to expand...

Say 'trffic three times with your car window down and he might still grant ya wish.

Richards to Everton makes no sense to me, I just don't think they either need him or he's a Martinez type of player. Then again Txiki has proven to have unnatural transfer powers so maybe, just maybe its true.
 
I can see Richards going to a London club like West Ham .
I can`t see the likes of Liverpool or Arsenal buying him .
Those type of clubs passed him by 2 years ago . When he was a decent right back .
 
baildon blue said:
I can see Richards going to a London club like West Ham .
I can`t see the likes of Liverpool or Arsenal buying him .
Those type of clubs passed him by 2 years ago . When he was a decent right back .
Click to expand...
He was more then decent 2 years ago.
 
Just saw this off his Facebook page..."Micah has been named the 28th fittest male athlete in the world"...
 
Negredo09 said:
Just saw this off his Facebook page..."Micah has been named the 28th fittest male athlete in the world"...
Click to expand...
23rd, Sports Illustrated have listed it incredibly awkwardly; 50 is actually number 1..?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.si.com/edge/photos/2014/08/05/sports-illustrated-fittest-50-athletes-sports#28" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.si.com/edge/photos/2014/08/0 ... -sports#28</a>
 
the bars been raised to high for him ,he's just not good enough but nobody will take him on his current wages. Lets see how much he really wants playing time or will it be a case of sitting in the stands and running his contract down?
 
In the paper it says he will play against Arsenal .
Where in trouble if that happens tomorrow .
 
As I have stated it wouldn't surprise me if he did and not only that he was given the armband for the last time. I can see him leaving next week, one final hey ho at Wembley say goodbye to the fans and on to a new club and new start.
 
If he does play,from a sentimental point,its a great gesture,however,we obviously wont be taking the game very seriously.

I obviously hope he has a stormer but i fear the Richards we knew is long gone unfortunately.
 
Why are people against Micah playing tomorrow?

He's a better right back than Clichy. He's a better centre back than Boyata.
 
Sorry but he had not looked good at all pre-season and I would not be happy if he plays tomorrow ... He should have been doing extra work before pre-season but instead he looks bulkier and slower than ever ..... I dunno if he's taking poor advice but his career is on the line and for me losing some bulk should not be that difficult ....
 
kun said:
Why are people against Micah playing tomorrow?

He's a better right back than Clichy. He's a better centre back than Boyata.
Click to expand...

Did you not see Clichy during pre-season? He looks better at right back than at left back dare I say, he was definitely one of the surprises of the summer.

I love Micah but he hasn't impressed me at all during pre-season.
 
The papers are going by the fact that Zabaleta and Sagna out and Richards is the only other RB available. They probably have no idea that Clichy has been playing there or thought he was just filling in for afew pre season games. I think Clichy is a better full back then Richards, Richards has barely played in years let alone played well. Huge fan of Richards by the way but he has stagnated IMO he lacks the positional sense to play CB and doesn't have the pace or stamina levels to play RB for us. Maybe a loan so he can get game time but I believe his future is elsewhere unfortunately. I cant imagine he will be starting tomorrow can't see Rekik, Sinclair or Guidetti starting either as we seem to be trying to sell them and wont want to risk injury.
 
Why would we risk an injury prone player in a game that is more or less meaningless if we are about to sell him?
 
dachoosen1 said:
The papers are going by the fact that Zabaleta and Sagna out and Richards is the only other RB available. They probably have no idea that Clichy has been playing there or thought he was just filling in for afew pre season games. I think Clichy is a better full back then Richards, Richards has barely played in years let alone played well. Huge fan of Richards by the way but he has stagnated IMO he lacks the positional sense to play CB and doesn't have the pace or stamina levels to play RB for us. Maybe a loan so he can get game time but I believe his future is elsewhere unfortunately. I cant imagine he will be starting tomorrow can't see Rekik, Sinclair or Guidetti starting either as we seem to be trying to sell them and wont want to risk injury.
Click to expand...
Selling Rekik?
 
sam-caddick said:
kun said:
Why are people against Micah playing tomorrow?

He's a better right back than Clichy. He's a better centre back than Boyata.
Click to expand...

Did you not see Clichy during pre-season? He looks better at right back than at left back dare I say, he was definitely one of the surprises of the summer.

I love Micah but he hasn't impressed me at all during pre-season.
Click to expand...
I agree, Clichy has looked very good in 2 or 3 frendlies, but IIRC last time he played there he was ripped apart by Fulham.

Micah has many years behind him and is a natural right back. When fit he can be a very good right back, and will show that at his next club.
 
lol sorry meant they would be leaving, rumour was PSV were close to a loan deal with Rekik. The others I listed would assume are being sold.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top