George Hannah said:
LoveCity said:
Guessing he won't be even on the bench today... he was apparently at a casino till 4am this morning.
West Ham and Newcastle seem the most serious, with some interest from Sunderland. But his wage demands are incredible considering what he's done (nothing) in the last two seasons. Could go down to the wire this one. Oldham could suffer more than City, a 20% sell-on fee even from £6m would help them considerably.
It sometimes seems to me that more common sense should be exercised by posters given the perusal of this site by those media hacks who seek to do City harm. Smears about Micah and others who are moving on are manna for these creatures. There are interesting threads on RAWK about their efforts to minimise similar damaging posts at this very sensitive time.
While I think you're being extremely paranoid here, maybe they ought to look here to counter the propaganda Micah's representatives are feeding the press to paint City as the bad guy.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2733717/Micah-Richards-gone-Gary-Neville-s-successor-England-Manchester-City-reserve-transfer-gem.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... r-gem.html</a>
Pellegrini has pointed to Richards' injury problems last season, but those close to the versatile defender insist he was unavailable for just 10 games last season.
Yeah... no.