Richards

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ric said:
West Ham would be a good move for him, as Allardyce has a bit of a reputation for reigniting players' careers (certainly whilst at Bolton).

Think we'll do well to get a fee of any note for him though given his contract situation, unless we refuse to let him go on loan but that could be self-defeating. £5m would probably be a fair deal in the circumstances.

Can't see us getting £5mil mate - I reckon we'd have to subsidise his wages as well for a year to the tune of approx £20k per week to get him to go. We'll prob get £3mil for him.
 
El Mago said:
LoveCity said:
Two West Ham ITKs saying he could be going there... pending an agreement in wages (always a problem with a money motivated player like Richards).

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.ironviews.com/west-ham-advanced-talks-micah-richards/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.ironviews.com/west-ham-advan ... -richards/</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.claretandhugh.info/city-ace-back-on-the-irons-radar/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=city-ace-back-on-the-irons-radar" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.claretandhugh.info/city-ace- ... rons-radar</a>

But a loan deal? We must have no cash offers if so. Someone on KUMB contradicted these saying it could be a £9m (LOL!) permanent deal.

Unless they structure it as a loan deal with more to be paid at the end of his contract.

We are all motivated by money.

Why do I leave my job to get paid less ?


Don't blame Micah, blame the person who offered him such salary.

He may be smart enough to understand that cutting his wages for one year and getting his career back on track (a career by the way that only has 5 years left) may be the best thing for his longterm finances.
 
BlueDeadHead said:
El Mago said:
LoveCity said:
Two West Ham ITKs saying he could be going there... pending an agreement in wages (always a problem with a money motivated player like Richards).

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.ironviews.com/west-ham-advanced-talks-micah-richards/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.ironviews.com/west-ham-advan ... -richards/</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.claretandhugh.info/city-ace-back-on-the-irons-radar/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=city-ace-back-on-the-irons-radar" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.claretandhugh.info/city-ace- ... rons-radar</a>

But a loan deal? We must have no cash offers if so. Someone on KUMB contradicted these saying it could be a £9m (LOL!) permanent deal.

Unless they structure it as a loan deal with more to be paid at the end of his contract.

We are all motivated by money.

Why do I leave my job to get paid less ?


Don't blame Micah, blame the person who offered him such salary.

He may be smart enough to understand that cutting his wages for one year and getting his career back on track (a career by the way that only has 5 years left) may be the best thing for his longterm finances.


why do you say 5 years - not having a go just asking why?
 
worsleyweb said:
BlueDeadHead said:
El Mago said:
We are all motivated by money.

Why do I leave my job to get paid less ?


Don't blame Micah, blame the person who offered him such salary.

He may be smart enough to understand that cutting his wages for one year and getting his career back on track (a career by the way that only has 5 years left) may be the best thing for his longterm finances.


why do you say 5 years - not having a go just asking why?

That puts him at 31. Yeah he could play longer but that is getting near the end IMO for someone with his injury history. Probably should have said 5-7.
 
BlueDeadHead said:
worsleyweb said:
BlueDeadHead said:
He may be smart enough to understand that cutting his wages for one year and getting his career back on track (a career by the way that only has 5 years left) may be the best thing for his longterm finances.


why do you say 5 years - not having a go just asking why?

That puts him at 31. Yeah he could play longer but that is getting near the end IMO for someone with his injury history. Probably should have said 5-7.

Nah you were right first time, he'd have to put some effort in to carry on past 31.
 
citysince88 said:
The only criticism I think is fair of meeks is his expectation he should be getting more football thus why he turned the clubs offer down, for him to think he should be ahead of zabba is nigh on delusional given their past couple of seasons. You have to question whether Micah has the stomach for the fight.

Not interested in the fight ...seems to be more about the money and celebrity, hence his career is going backwards
 
Manchester City are ready to call the bluff of defender Micah Richards and let him run down the final months of his contract.
The Citizens have placed an £8million valuation on the head of the powerful right back and are refusing to budge from it.
Richards and his camp were hoping City would blink first and lower his asking price with the summer transfer window set to slam shut at 11pm on September 1.
But the former England defender may now have to lower his own wage demands to force through a late move with the club prepared to play hardball.
The 26-year-old earns £70,000 a week at the Etihad Stadium and is looking for similar money due to his relatively low market price.
However, the type of clubs currently interested in the player can't sanction the total package involved, with Hull City and West Ham United both having loan offers rebuffed.
The champions are refusing to countenance subsidising his entire wage to show they are no longer a soft touch in the transfer market when it comes to releasing their fringe players.

http://www.sportinastorm.com/Premie...ards-bluff/X1Y47Z1795549#sthash.WzNRq4s6.dpuf
 
Guessing he won't be even on the bench today... he was apparently at a casino till 4am this morning.

West Ham and Newcastle seem the most serious, with some interest from Sunderland. But his wage demands are incredible considering what he's done (nothing) in the last two seasons. Could go down to the wire this one. Oldham could suffer more than City, a 20% sell-on fee even from £6m would help them considerably.
 
LoveCity said:
Guessing he won't be even on the bench today... he was apparently at a casino till 4am this morning.

West Ham and Newcastle seem the most serious, with some interest from Sunderland. But his wage demands are incredible considering what he's done (nothing) in the last two seasons. Could go down to the wire this one. Oldham could suffer more than City, a 20% sell-on fee even from £6m would help them considerably.
It sometimes seems to me that more common sense should be exercised by posters given the perusal of this site by those media hacks who seek to do City harm. Smears about Micah and others who are moving on are manna for these creatures. There are interesting threads on RAWK about their efforts to minimise similar damaging posts at this very sensitive time.
 
George Hannah said:
LoveCity said:
Guessing he won't be even on the bench today... he was apparently at a casino till 4am this morning.

West Ham and Newcastle seem the most serious, with some interest from Sunderland. But his wage demands are incredible considering what he's done (nothing) in the last two seasons. Could go down to the wire this one. Oldham could suffer more than City, a 20% sell-on fee even from £6m would help them considerably.
It sometimes seems to me that more common sense should be exercised by posters given the perusal of this site by those media hacks who seek to do City harm. Smears about Micah and others who are moving on are manna for these creatures. There are interesting threads on RAWK about their efforts to minimise similar damaging posts at this very sensitive time.

and that place is a weird as shit cult. I'd rather we keep having opinions and discussings rather than a 'don't mention the war' policy.

I do get your point though I guess we might be making a couple hacks lives easier but fuck em, they're gonna write bullshit anyway.

Anyhoo back to micah. from that article it sounds like we are making a statement with our fringe players now which might hurt us short term but in the long run great for us to show we ain't soft anymore.
 
George Hannah said:
LoveCity said:
Guessing he won't be even on the bench today... he was apparently at a casino till 4am this morning.

West Ham and Newcastle seem the most serious, with some interest from Sunderland. But his wage demands are incredible considering what he's done (nothing) in the last two seasons. Could go down to the wire this one. Oldham could suffer more than City, a 20% sell-on fee even from £6m would help them considerably.
It sometimes seems to me that more common sense should be exercised by posters given the perusal of this site by those media hacks who seek to do City harm. Smears about Micah and others who are moving on are manna for these creatures. There are interesting threads on RAWK about their efforts to minimise similar damaging posts at this very sensitive time.

While I think you're being extremely paranoid here, maybe they ought to look here to counter the propaganda Micah's representatives are feeding the press to paint City as the bad guy.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2733717/Micah-Richards-gone-Gary-Neville-s-successor-England-Manchester-City-reserve-transfer-gem.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... r-gem.html</a>

Pellegrini has pointed to Richards' injury problems last season, but those close to the versatile defender insist he was unavailable for just 10 games last season.

Yeah... no.
 
LoveCity said:
George Hannah said:
LoveCity said:
Guessing he won't be even on the bench today... he was apparently at a casino till 4am this morning.

West Ham and Newcastle seem the most serious, with some interest from Sunderland. But his wage demands are incredible considering what he's done (nothing) in the last two seasons. Could go down to the wire this one. Oldham could suffer more than City, a 20% sell-on fee even from £6m would help them considerably.
It sometimes seems to me that more common sense should be exercised by posters given the perusal of this site by those media hacks who seek to do City harm. Smears about Micah and others who are moving on are manna for these creatures. There are interesting threads on RAWK about their efforts to minimise similar damaging posts at this very sensitive time.

While I think you're being extremely paranoid here, maybe they ought to look here to counter the propaganda Micah's representatives are feeding the press to paint City as the bad guy.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2733717/Micah-Richards-gone-Gary-Neville-s-successor-England-Manchester-City-reserve-transfer-gem.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... r-gem.html</a>

Pellegrini has pointed to Richards' injury problems last season, but those close to the versatile defender insist he was unavailable for just 10 games last season.

Yeah... no.
Wow. That must have come directly from Richards' agent.
 
If he insists he has been fit to play then other clubs will think he must be rubbish if pellers wouldn't even play him when zab was knackered so why take a chance on him
If he just sits in the stand collecting his money for the next year he will go down in my estimations
 
karen7 said:
If he insists he has been fit to play then other clubs will think he must be rubbish if pellers wouldn't even play him when zab was knackered so why take a chance on him
If he just sits in the stand collecting his money for the next year he will go down in my estimations
I might be mistaken, but didn't Rodwell say a similar thing to the press recently?

If both are true, for me it just shows that Pellegrini didn't trust them enough to play. The fact we did a domestic double largely without them shows the manager might have had a point.
 
Dribble said:
karen7 said:
If he insists he has been fit to play then other clubs will think he must be rubbish if pellers wouldn't even play him when zab was knackered so why take a chance on him
If he just sits in the stand collecting his money for the next year he will go down in my estimations
I might be mistaken, but didn't Rodwell say a similar thing to the press recently?

If both are true, for me it just shows that Pellegrini didn't trust them enough to play. The fact we did a domestic double largely without them shows the manager might have had a point.

I cant remember a game apart from the Newcastle league cup game which we won in which richards started and played till the end (or most of the game). In the FA cup game only b/c he was substituted for Zaba, similarly v bayern away IIRC
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top