Rickie Lambert

ForzaMancini said:
Latest report now saying £4m with add-ons. Personally I think he'd be a decent enough signing. 60 goals in his last 3 seasons I think it was, can't complain. Good 3rd choice striker. An English Dzeko.

Not in Dzeko's class as a finisher but a very decent third striker.
 
Not worth the money Liverpool are spending . Liverpool would have been better buying someone like Lukaku . He would have been better value .
 
Such a strange signing.

Lukaku, Benteke and Bony are much better options with many years on their side to improve.
 
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Such a strange signing.

Lukaku, Benteke and Bony are much better options with many years on their side to improve.
I can believe the idea of a Porto type deal with regards to Lallana and Lambert to Liverpool.

Bournemouth will get a good chunk of any Lallana deal.

Wouldn't be surprised to see Liverpool go back and pick apart Southampton again, this summer doesn't look too good for Saints fans.
 
Davs 19 said:
ForzaMancini said:
Latest report now saying £4m with add-ons. Personally I think he'd be a decent enough signing. 60 goals in his last 3 seasons I think it was, can't complain. Good 3rd choice striker. An English Dzeko.

Not in Dzeko's class as a finisher but a very decent third striker.

Agreed, that's why I said an English version as well all know English players are in general, crap!
 
very good signing a good technical player who has a good goal scoring record

baildon blue said:
Not worth the money Liverpool are spending . Liverpool would have been better buying someone like Lukaku . He would have been better value .
bit of difference lukaka would cost upwards of 20 m they are only spending 4m on a good player
 
Cheadle_hulmeBlue said:
very good signing a good technical player who has a good goal scoring record

baildon blue said:
Not worth the money Liverpool are spending . Liverpool would have been better buying someone like Lukaku . He would have been better value .
bit of difference lukaka would cost upwards of 20 m they are only spending 4m on a good player

Yeah, I'm with you on this one. £4m for a back-up striker with a goal scoring record seems like sensible (maybe not exciting) business. How Lukaku entered into the comparison is beyond me.

Not sure it's the best move for Rickie, but if you knew this was your international swan song, had one last chance to play for your childhood club, and could earn a few pounds for you and your family before retiring, maybe it's not a huge hit to play second fiddle.
 
Tron Coltrane said:
Cheadle_hulmeBlue said:
very good signing a good technical player who has a good goal scoring record

baildon blue said:
Not worth the money Liverpool are spending . Liverpool would have been better buying someone like Lukaku . He would have been better value .
bit of difference lukaka would cost upwards of 20 m they are only spending 4m on a good player

Yeah, I'm with you on this one. £4m for a back-up striker with a goal scoring record seems like sensible (maybe not exciting) business. How Lukaku entered into the comparison is beyond me.

Not sure it's the best move for Rickie, but if you knew this was your international swan song, had one last chance to play for your childhood club, and could earn a few pounds for you and your family before retiring, maybe it's not a huge hit to play second fiddle.
I thought Liverpool were paying 9 million for Lambert . If they are only paying 4 million its not bad value .
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.