If you have the best player's at every position, this is always better. But if there was q position where you are weakest, its best its at fullback.How many times have teams with dedicated full backs won the title?
How many times have teams with dedicated full backs won the CL
You talk as if full backs are not a requirement for a successful team. Maybe not for some examples but the overwhelming majority have dedicated full backs. You need to pull your head out of the pep tunnel and realise most successful sides in the history of football have dedicated defenders defending, dedicated midfielders midfielding and a fukin dedicated striker striking! It’s bizarre that you think it should be any other way! Especially when opponents have figured out your weaknesses and exploit them on the weekly!
And almost every team is weak somewhere. Chelsea at Goalie, Arsenal at Goalie and striker until this season, Liverpool was weak at full back, and probably still are...
If uou can have every position be great, its best. But in the end it is the Superstars and yhe heart of the great teams that make the difference
I get it that many here think Nunes and Lewis are below standard, but they arent. They are just not stars. And they dont need to be
