Right back options

Right now they are levels apart and it’s not like Tino wasn’t a top talent when he emerged. Lewis just doesn’t have the same tools as Livramento. It starts from the body also the pace and also the fact that Livramento is defensively and also offensively better than Lewis.
Also personally I don’t see what other see in Lewis but each their own. Nunes is our only RB option in my opinion.
The moment he is out we are fucked once again.
A mere 2 years ago, Lewis was more highly rated than Tino . There is a reason he has 5 international appearances to Tino's 1. Its because he was that highly rated. I'd give it to you that he doesn't touch Tino in athleticism. And Tino is supreme in the air. It really depends on the year you pick in the last 2. 2 years ago Lewis was rated higher, he and his team then had a bad season while Tino had a great season with his club (from an expectation standpoint). So Tino is now considered better on last season's performance. This does not make Lewis chopped liver. Nor does it mean he cant overtake Tino again. He very sure can.

They are both good prospects. Tino has more physical tools. Rico has more tactical and cerebral tools

I know you are one of those guys who doesn't rate Rico. he is not everyone's cup of tea. That's okay. But he is a damn fine Right back prospect. Just like Tino.
 
See! You are rewriting history now. The "We really need a backup for Rodri' cries was what led to the 50 million Kalvin Philips and later 50 million Nunes purchases.

In the end, neither achieved the hoped for goal. We got lucky coz Nunes looked good in a makeshift position but Kslvin has been an Albatross for years now

All the same characteristics you tout about Liveramento was touted about Phillips. He is a dedicated DM. Can do all the running. Give Rodri a breather. He is an English international. CL levels player. He'll be a 5 million a year investment and if he saves Rodri's leg it will be well worth it ... And on and on...

Then we bought him, he didn't make the grade and we got stuck.

Do not repeat the same mistake. Especially when we have 2 good players at the position in Lewis and Nunes.

Folks forget now that, Lewis was getting in ahead of one of England's best ever in Kyle Walker for some games 2 seasons ago. He too is an 'English International' seeing as that's what we are calling Livramento now with all of his 1 cap.

We do not have a weakness at Right back. We have underdeveloped talents. Let them develop.
Nunes and Lewis are weaknesses. They don’t get anywhere near Liverpool Arsenal or Chelsea first 11. Maybe even their squads at RB. Neither actually is a RB god knows what Rico’s position is and Nunes is a bang average CM who our owner manager says can’t play midfield. To suggest they aren’t weaknesses is just daft.
 
Nunes and Lewis are weaknesses. They don’t get anywhere near Liverpool Arsenal or Chelsea first 11. Maybe even their squads at RB. Neither actually is a RB god knows what Rico’s position is and Nunes is a bang average CM who our owner manager says can’t play midfield. To suggest they aren’t weaknesses is just daft.
Easy with the insults. Especially when your arguments aren't that good. Rico is a Right back. He has always been.

Nunes and Lewis are as good as anyone playing Rightback for Arsenal or Liverpool.

We had Frimpomg and deemed him not good enough to start at Right back and kept Lewis and Nunes. We could have gone for Frimpong this summer. We consciously didn't... That should tell you we don't rate him for our system.
Which is different from what Liverpool or Arsenal do. So whether you can or can't get into the starting 11 of another team isnt proof you are a weakness. Frimpong couldn't get into pur starting 11 either... Is he now a Liverpool weakness.

Nunes and Rico are not weaknesses. They are underdeveloped at worst.
 
Right now they are levels apart and it’s not like Tino wasn’t a top talent when he emerged. Lewis just doesn’t have the same tools as Livramento. It starts from the body also the pace and also the fact that Livramento is defensively and also offensively better than Lewis.
Also personally I don’t see what other see in Lewis but each their own. Nunes is our only RB option in my opinion.
The moment he is out we are fucked once again.

"Offensively better" than Lewis?

In what way? He doesn't score and he doesn't set up goals, so...?? What's so great?
 
Nunes and Lewis are weaknesses. They don’t get anywhere near Liverpool Arsenal or Chelsea first 11. Maybe even their squads at RB. Neither actually is a RB god knows what Rico’s position is and Nunes is a bang average CM who our owner manager says can’t play midfield. To suggest they aren’t weaknesses is just daft.
There's definitely an argument Nunes is no worse than Bradley, Frimpong, Timber, White and Tomiyasu.

The best right backs in the league seem to be at Chelsea, Palace, Spurs and Newcastle.
 
"Offensively better" than Lewis?

In what way? He doesn't score and he doesn't set up goals, so...?? What's so great?
I swear none of the people adamant about Livaremento have ever seen him play.

He’s more Walker than Cancelo put it that way, and he’s not half as good as either.

Offensively, Nunes is one of the best fullbacks in the world statistically going forwards, he’s got a nice relationship with Haaland and whoever plays out wide.

We might as a club decide to get somebody in who is more solid defensively, but unless we sign Hakimi, we’re not going to find somebody that solid defensively who is better than Nunes going forwards.
 
433 (235 in possession) or 4231 (2251 in possesion) with double wide fullbacks is likely the best way to setup our strongest 11, hence why Nunes is so vital in this, and nobody else in the squad can do this.

But I think if say a Nunes or Ait Nouri is unavailable and we want to re-create the attacking shape, either a 235 or 2251, I've read some people don't want say Khus/Akanji to make a back 3 and hence a 3-2 shape as it seems inferior and more passive.

I kind of get it, but all is technically not lost, because the whole point of those shapes is you need to push up 2 defenders, it doesn't have to technically be the fullbacks, you can push 1 fullback and 1 centre back to recreate the same in possession instructure.

For example, suppose we want to rest Nunes, here is a basic 4231 starting shape:
1754179968172.png

Instead of pushing up both fullbacks, we can get the same affect by pushing up 1 (Ait Nouri), and a player at CB (Rodri/Nico G, heck obviously even John Stones as well), and we can recreate a 235 attacking shape easily like this:

1754180063168.png

Now I put all our best players in this to make it work, but you can easily make this more defensive by using John Stones/Nico G as the false CB, and switch Foden for Rodri/Nico G. I like Foden as the 8 there, but easy switch.

So it's still possible to have a 2-3 base (rather than 3-2) even if you rest one of the fullbacks.

Only made this comment because I saw a video of someone saying they hate the 3-2 base shape because its too defensive, which I somewhat agree with, the 2-3 is a more aggressive forward thinking City that I like more, but it's still possible.
 
Easy with the insults. Especially when your arguments aren't that good. Rico is a Right back. He has always been.

Nunes and Lewis are as good as anyone playing Rightback for Arsenal or Liverpool.

We had Frimpomg and deemed him not good enough to start at Right back and kept Lewis and Nunes. We could have gone for Frimpong this summer. We consciously didn't... That should tell you we don't rate him for our system.
Which is different from what Liverpool or Arsenal do. So whether you can or can't get into the starting 11 of another team isnt proof you are a weakness. Frimpong couldn't get into pur starting 11 either... Is he now a Liverpool weakness.

Nunes and Rico are not weaknesses. They are underdeveloped at worst.
No insults at all, just re-read my post. Frinpong went a season starting for a team that won the lot. The premier league champions have then decided to buy him. Rico lost his spot to a midfielder not good enough to play midfield who is not a rb. Neither started the cup final. Bradley is a better RB than both in my opinion as well. Arsenal have Ben white and Jurien Timber both better. Gusto and James both better. Neither player would attract interest from a top club. They’re weaknesses.
 
Wasn't that what i said. Someone to give Rodri a breather?

You may be over it. But he is still a financial and decision burden on the club. And we didn't pay significantly over the odds for him.

The issue is not whether any player can flop. We all get that ans understand it. What's at issue is overpaying for a player and hoping for the best..



No, Nunes wasn't a panic buy. He was 3rd choice, sure. But not a panic buy.

He got very few opportunities at Central midfield and he was fantastic in the few opportunities as a winger. Produced more assists and attacking play than players playing more minutes and with greater fan support.

Then he started vout slow at fullback, then grew into it as his confidence rose

We are not going through the whole season with juat Nunes as Right back. Rico Lewis is not chopped liver :)


No he isn't. His best games as a City player have come at RB. He is a Right back. Last season was just a poor season. For Everyone. Lewis is a fantastic inverted Right back. But a pretty capable traditional one too.

He is not a midfielder. He is a Rightbsck with the technical skills and intelligence of a midfielder. But he is a Right back.


1. I am confident in Rico and Nunes. I think they both fit well with the squad. Not the very best but as top team rotational players.

Tino to me is on the same level as the above 2. He is no Hakimi. He wont be a difference maker this season. Just another solid option. And Rico has AA good of a chance as Tino of developing into world class.

I cannot for the life of me understand why anyone wants to pay 80 million for another solid option at Right back when we already have 2.solid options .That's wild to me.

Now if you wanna pay 80 mil to get Hakimi, finr.

Or 10 - 30 mill for another solid option with top class potential. Im all in. But 80 mil ? No. Just no.

Archie Gray is a far better fit for us in my view. You . Wanna spunk some money?. Fine! Go pay 45-55 million for Archie Gray. It would be excessive but at least his potential as a footballer is World Class.

We got 45 million for Palmer. Who was a far better prospect than Livra is. Let that sink in

That said, if pressed for an answer, I'd sell Ortega, Akanji and Gundogan (all options currently on the table) and open up an option for any young Right back anywhere. Including the likes of Fresneda, Arnau, Martim, Alberto Costa, Givairo,, Juanlu etc. All of whom have good potential.

There is a trailer load ot up and coming Right backs. None of whom will cost above 35 million. Talk less more than double that?

80 mil for Lives is just poor management. If he ever becomes the absolute best Right back in the league. He still wont cost a penny over 80 million.

Tp suggest we should pay 80 million for a player who isnt the clear #1 right back in the world is a joke to me.
There no such thing as overpaying. The markets & availability sets the rates. The vendor charges what he believes is the maximum figure with negotiating wriggle room, & the buyer will offer the least he believes will be accepted, knowing he'll probably have to negotiate up. In the end, it's not what the player is worth (which is subjective), it's what he's worth to the buyer.

Whether a panic buy or whether way down the list of options, I personally never rated Matheus Nunes, & to underpin this, several members of this board reported that Wolves fans who they knew, & fans on Wolves forums couldn't believe we were interested in him at all, or the price we eventually paid.

That's all history. After the Paqueta transfer fell through, & Palace reportedly turned down our £60m offer for Ezé, City made a late bid for Nunes & Wolves snapped our hand off.

Evidently you rate Nunes very highly, which puts you in a minority. I don't, but again just like arsehole's, everyone's got an opinion too. HOWEVER, I'm more than happy to say that imo, Nunes has earned a reprieve because of his improving RB performances toward the end of last season, when we effectively had no one else.

But just as I was coming round to the idea that Nunes would be around longer than I'd initially hoped, a few media reports & ITK's have stated he (along with others), has been told they're free to leave if a suitable offer comes in.

In my opinion, we need to acquire a specialist RB, BUT I'd be happy to see Matheus remain to challenge & rotate with a top class, long-term specialist full back. He's done enough in the last few months to deserve that.

As for Rico, he's an excellent player & a good RB. However, as Pep said, he just wishes he was taller & heavier. I don't see Rico's future as a full back, I see it in Central midfield.

He's only 20, but I see a level of awareness in his play that belies his years. Yes, we currently have better options centrally, so taking our time & building him up slowly in midfield is the correct pathway for him.

If you're confident in a RB pairing of Rico & Matheus for the season, that's your business, as again I think that puts you in a minority, & for very good reason. I'm not, for the reasons I've stated above. Livramento (similar or above) & Nunes? I'd be happy with that & Rico getting minutes centrally.

I can't be arsed commenting on your list of alternatives or why you think Livramento isn't worth what Newcastle reportedly value him at, but needless to say, I think we just have different standards & expectations of City.

You're quite happy to settle for Matheus Nunes & Rico Lewis as our RB pairing in the PL & CL for the season. I'll leave it there...
 
No insults at all, just re-read my post. Frinpong went a season starting for a team that won the lot. The premier league champions have then decided to buy him. Rico lost his spot to a midfielder not good enough to play midfield who is not a rb. Neither started the cup final. Bradley is a better RB than both in my opinion as well. Arsenal have Ben white and Jurien Timber both better. Gusto and James both better. Neither player would attract interest from a top club. They’re weaknesses.
Well, lets just say i cant wait for the season to play out. Let's revisit this exchange in December.
 
433 (235 in possession) or 4231 (2251 in possesion) with double wide fullbacks is likely the best way to setup our strongest 11, hence why Nunes is so vital in this, and nobody else in the squad can do this.

But I think if say a Nunes or Ait Nouri is unavailable and we want to re-create the attacking shape, either a 235 or 2251, I've read some people don't want say Khus/Akanji to make a back 3 and hence a 3-2 shape as it seems inferior and more passive.

I kind of get it, but all is technically not lost, because the whole point of those shapes is you need to push up 2 defenders, it doesn't have to technically be the fullbacks, you can push 1 fullback and 1 centre back to recreate the same in possession instructure.

For example, suppose we want to rest Nunes, here is a basic 4231 starting shape:
View attachment 164792

Instead of pushing up both fullbacks, we can get the same affect by pushing up 1 (Ait Nouri), and a player at CB (Rodri/Nico G, heck obviously even John Stones as well), and we can recreate a 235 attacking shape easily like this:

View attachment 164793

Now I put all our best players in this to make it work, but you can easily make this more defensive by using John Stones/Nico G as the false CB, and switch Foden for Rodri/Nico G. I like Foden as the 8 there, but easy switch.

So it's still possible to have a 2-3 base (rather than 3-2) even if you rest one of the fullbacks.

Only made this comment because I saw a video of someone saying they hate the 3-2 base shape because its too defensive, which I somewhat agree with, the 2-3 is a more aggressive forward thinking City that I like more, but it's still possible.
Doku is unhappy seeing this.
 
See! You are rewriting history now. The "We really need a backup for Rodri' cries was what led to the 50 million Kalvin Philips and later 50 million Nunes purchases.

In the end, neither achieved the hoped for goal. We got lucky coz Nunes looked good in a makeshift position but Kslvin has been an Albatross for years now

All the same characteristics you tout about Liveramento was touted about Phillips. He is a dedicated DM. Can do all the running. Give Rodri a breather. He is an English international. CL levels player. He'll be a 5 million a year investment and if he saves Rodri's leg it will be well worth it ... And on and on...

Then we bought him, he didn't make the grade and we got stuck.

Do not repeat the same mistake. Especially when we have 2 good players at the position in Lewis and Nunes.

Folks forget now that, Lewis was getting in ahead of one of England's best ever in Kyle Walker for some games 2 seasons ago. He too is an 'English International' seeing as that's what we are calling Livramento now with all of his 1 cap.

We do not have a weakness at Right back. We have underdeveloped talents. Let them develop.

Agree with all of that except we don't have 2 good players in that position. We simply don't....You state that Lewis got picked over walker as a way of saying how good he is....but then ignore the fact that Nunes who has never played fullback took his place at the back end of last season

Neither are good enough. And while you are correct and we shouldn't rush into buying a fullback and if the club have assessed Livramento and said he ain't the player or not worth the money then that's fine.....but we do need a full back
 
The issue wasnt losing Rodri though. It was losing Rodri, Ake, Walker, Stones, Dias, Akanji, Kev, Foden, Haaland......
And the loss and downturn in Walker, Ake Stones and Kdb were all being talked about as well...all were either clearly visible or in the case of Ake and Stones being injured likely to happen
 
No, a realist just like when I said we'd be fucked without Rodri, unless we got someone to challenge, rest & rotate with him.

The replies I got?

1. No one's coming here if Rodri's here.

2. Stones "can do a job".

3. Gundog's back. He can "do a job"

4. Kovacic "can do a job".

5. Akanji "can do a job".

We lost Rodri. Our season collapsed. We won fuck all. We were nearly relegated from the CL.

Mate, it didn't take Einstein to figure out what the likely outcome would be.

Also, let's say we go forward with Nunes as our RB for the season & he gets injured. Who dya reckon "can do a job" instead?
What a pile of revisionist horseshit.

Fucking hell and I thought some of your posts were half reasonable.

Miserable bastard!

There, stick that on your list of replies for next year's flap.
 
Last edited:
Rico makes recruiting a RB this summer more difficult because there isn't space in the midfield for him. I think if Bernardo, Gundo & Kovacic are gone next summer Rico will be moved into midfield permanently and we will sign a starting RB without having to lose a talented academy lad.

So the midfield next season could in theory be:

Rodri, Nico G, Reijnders, Rico, Cherki, Foden with Nypan coming back from loan too for even more depth if all goes well.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top