Lots of things I stand for. But, unlike you, not the right to rob, loot and burn peoples' livelihoods.BTH said:Prestwich_Blue said:He was elected as a Labour councillor in May. What a great asset he is.
Better than standing for nothing though, eh?
Aye, but many people on this thread have said exactly that. Idiots trying to be the big man, oh these fucking scrotes wouldn't do anything if they just stamped their authority on the situations blah fucking blah and shot some people. Firstly, the posters making this 'argument' are utter retards. Unfortunately young kids growing up in the ghetto shoot people for no reason at all. We've all heard the stories. In fact, most of the people saying send in the army are the types who bemoan social decay and young teenagers killing each other for no reason at all and yet want to turn that bloody eye for an eye mentality on British soldiers. Secondly, if the army turns on the people with guns they'll be joined by people other than looters and rioters, they'll be joined by ideologues who are far more dangerous. Intelligent, organised people leading mindless idiots. I'm sure that's never caused trouble in history before. That's part of the problem, the posters I'm talking about clearly haven't a clue about history and how this shit all starts, it often starts with tit-for-tat, you don't even have to look very far. Northern Ireland; 400 British soldiers killed by the IRA but only 100 IRA killed by the British Army to compensate. Taking on an armed population on their own patch is no walk in the park like most of these morons calling for armed soldiers on the street imagining it'll be a glorious fish in a barrel affair that'll re-establish order in minutes. Armed soldiers will create nothing more than a spiral of violence which will send this country into civil war. I'm glad you get it SWP's back but some people on here evidently need it spelled out in black and white.SWP's back said:Thats why it shouldn't and wouldn't ever happen.Skashion said:If they send the army in with live ammunition, this country is in civil war.SWP's back said:Send in the army minus live ammo. We can't have the armed forces shooting people on the streets.
The army would add man power, give them tear gas, water canons and rubber bullets.
This is madness.
mcfcliam said:chumpster1 said:@nickgriffinmepNick Griffin MEP
If the rumours of blacks and Muslims fighting each other in Leeds, Oldham & Nottingham are true . . .
Classy tweet from this ****.
The man needs aids, bad aids.
mcfcliam said:chumpster1 said:@nickgriffinmepNick Griffin MEP
If the rumours of blacks and Muslims fighting each other in Leeds, Oldham & Nottingham are true . . .
Classy tweet from this ****.
The man needs aids, bad aids.
SWP's back said:BTH said:SWP's back said:Fuck off and take your political bullshit with you, your opportunistic little shit.
This isn't about politics, it is about theft and looting and surely even you, with your myopic agenda can see that. Failing that, you'd just be a **** for trying to score points to suit an agenda.
Dear me. If this isn't a political issue, I don't know what is. Try and engage your brain before you spout your small-minded abuse, Tory boy.
You smell blood and see a career opportunity. You disgust me.
TheMightyQuinn said:SWP's back said:Just goes to show how great our political class are.Prestwich_Blue said:He was elected as a Labour councillor in May. What a great asset he is.
Very low of both of you.
This wouldn't be happening under Labour. It's that simple.