You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Rishi Sunak
- Thread starter west didsblue
- Start date
maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
haha, reallyThere is no evidence that the royal family bring in anything at all.
Well show me some.haha, really
maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
Well IMO he wasn't.He wa right though. Think he might be slightly better informed on trans issues than you, me or Sunak.
maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
Google is your friendWell show me some.
Never seen any reliable tourist research on the royal family. You pooh poohed my point, Google is your friend is no response.Google is your friend
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 33,387
Wasn't what ? better informed ,of course he was having had a trans child,and the isses they suffered, I haven't, Sunak hasn't and given your attitude pretty sure you haven't either.Well IMO he wasn't.
"Would you visit the UK if you could wander round or stay in a former royal palace?"Never seen any reliable tourist research on the royal family. You pooh poohed my point, Google is your friend is no response.
meltonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2013
- Messages
- 8,662
It wasn't a joke, he pointed out that Starmer can't tell us what a woman is, which is true. I really don't think that the pond life that would stab someone 14 times would watch PMQ's.
Starmers continuously stuck to the legal definition hasn’t he? That Sunak thinks it’s a point of contention he can go after rather than sticking to the legal definition himself, particularly given he’s the PM, is worrying in itself.
maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
No, I was answering the point the poster he made about the father being correct.Wasn't what ? better informed ,of course he was having had a trans child,and the isses they suffered, I haven't, Sunak hasn't and given your attitude pretty sure you haven't either.
maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
I didn't pooh pooh anything, the information is out there about what the Royal Family brings to the country in tourism. I'm just not your secretary.Never seen any reliable tourist research on the royal family. You pooh poohed my point, Google is your friend is no response.
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 33,387
Yes, and I'm pointing out the father is probably far better informed and experienced in these matters and is probably right.No, I was answering the point the poster he made about the father being correct.
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Of course Sunak doesn't care as he uses private healthcare
maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
on whether or not Sunak's comment was a joke or notYes, and I'm pointing out the father is probably far better informed and experienced in these matters and is probably right.
metalblue
Well-Known Member
Didn't realise that was part of the cancer treatment !
Why do you think the waiting lists are so long?
metalblue
Well-Known Member
Never seen any reliable tourist research on the royal family. You pooh poohed my point, Google is your friend is no response.
TBF they ain’t coming for our weather or cuisine - they’re coming for our history and the royal family is a huge part of that.
The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
Surely they’re coming for free NHS, council houses and schools??TBF they ain’t coming for our weather or cuisine - they’re coming for our history and the royal family is a huge part of that.
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 33,387
They come for many reasons, I don’t know what the ratio of all the UK tourists are to London tourists, but those not going to London aren’t coming for anything much monarchy related, and even all London tourists won’t all be coming just for just that. I’m not even a republican but realise that.The history side would be there with or without a monarchy.TBF they ain’t coming for our weather or cuisine - they’re coming for our history and the royal family is a huge part of that.
How do you know?TBF they ain’t coming for our weather or cuisine - they’re coming for our history and the royal family is a huge part of that.
Correct. See, for example, the Palace of Versailles.They come for many reasons, I don’t know what the ratio of all the UK tourists are to London tourists, but those not going to London aren’t coming for anything much monarchy related, and even all London tourists won’t all be coming just for just that. I’m not even a republican but realise that.The history side would be there with or without a monarchy.
Visit Britain, the body which collects tourism data, do not include the royals in their research.