Rishi Sunak

Much of the Maths I learned at school I have never, ever used in real life.

Trigonometry.
Quadratic equations.
Calculus. (What the fuck was that about?)
Calculating the volume of a cone.
Log tables.

I've forgotten how to do long division, as it's so much easier to use a calc. And in the unlikely event of my wanting to calculate the volume of a cone, I can look up the formula on the internet in a trice and then use the calc.

Like generals who want to fight the last war, politicians who poke their noses into education always want to make it fit for 1956, not 2056. This of course suits all those dinosaur Tory voters who think we should still be writing with quills and using the abacus.
 
amazing how little he knows - or thinks we are prepared to think he doesn't know - about his wife's dealings - very odd for a PM and a former Chancellor with a numbers obsession

 
BrianW said:
Much of the Maths I learned at school I have never, ever used in real life.

Trigonometry.
Quadratic equations.
Calculus. (What the fuck was that about?)
Calculating the volume of a cone.
Log tables.

I've forgotten how to do long division, as it's so much easier to use a calc. And in the unlikely event of my wanting to calculate the volume of a cone, I can look up the formula on the internet in a trice and then use the calc.

Like generals who want to fight the last war, politicians who poke their noses into education always want to make it fit for 1956, not 2056. This of course suits all those dinosaur Tory voters who think we should still be writing with quills and using the abacus.
Click to expand...
JRM wants things fit for 1856. The future as he calls it.
 
2nd question and an attempt at a nickname for Starmer as Sir Softy (has he just invented this one?). Used it again on 5th question.
Failed to address the point at any of Starmer's question resorting immediately to context-free numbers.
Sunak bleating about that Starmer's pension issue is a bit rich (pun maybe intended).
 
MillionMilesAway said:
2nd question and an attempt at a nickname for Starmer as Sir Softy (has he just invented this one?). Used it again on 5th question.
Failed to address the point at any of Starmer's question resorting immediately to context-free numbers.
Sunak bleating about that Starmer's pension issue is a bit rich (pun maybe intended).
Click to expand...
He's pathetic. As you say, quoting context free numbers is insulting to those suffering. a 45% increase in x sounds impressive, but not when x was so fucking low in the first place.

Sooner these destructive twats leave office, the better
 
MillionMilesAway said:
2nd question and an attempt at a nickname for Starmer as Sir Softy (has he just invented this one?). Used it again on 5th question.
Failed to address the point at any of Starmer's question resorting immediately to context-free numbers.
Sunak bleating about that Starmer's pension issue is a bit rich (pun maybe intended).
Click to expand...
Here we go , another tory trying to get a nickname going ala boris and the orange **** , starmer should call him mr out of touch or corrupt bastard
 
MillionMilesAway said:
2nd question and an attempt at a nickname for Starmer as Sir Softy (has he just invented this one?). Used it again on 5th question.
Failed to address the point at any of Starmer's question resorting immediately to context-free numbers.
Sunak bleating about that Starmer's pension issue is a bit rich (pun maybe intended).
Click to expand...

He boasted rape convictions up a massive 60% - thats still only 1.6% of total rape arrests leading to a conviction - you can see why Sunak likes to be clever with numbers
 
I’ve got a number for the wee ferret (not a fan of personal abuse, but he seems to enjoy silly name calling)
13.
13 years of Tory lies, sleaze, corruption and dismal failure.
Doesn‘t need any other context.
 
Not arsed about the bollox that he says anymore, he’s just the ultimate super rich, toff wanker.

Well done with your vote.
 
and if any of those civilians have the temerity to turn up on these shores Sunak will see to it that Braverman has his backing to deport them to Rwanda asap

 
bluethrunthru said:
and if any of those civilians have the temerity to turn up on these shores Sunak will see to it that Braverman has his backing to deport them to Rwanda asap

Click to expand...


Don’t get the link between our special forces rescuing British citizens from a war zone and what you have just come out with?
 
looks like Khartoum will be Kabul v2.0

Zero lessons have been learned and as ever this goes on whilst they fight their own internal psycho drama's - the most useless Govt ever - Suez is starting to look like a success
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top