Rival Fans Commentating on City Games

According to Carragher our goals are lucky and the Chelsea goals deserved , that is the crux of the matter , he's just another desperate delusional Dipper, if you take a lucky Champs league win away from his career he won f*ck all in the game , he was an average centre back , one club man who didnt have the bottle to leave the Dippers to progress his career when they were shite. If he was a tactical genius he would have gone into management but as Neville proved football managment needs a certain degree of intelligence and character , Carragher & Neville have neither.
Carragher was very fortunate as a player.
He finished playing just when defenders started to get red cards for deliberately fouling attackers, as the last man.
Did very well, for an absolute journeyman.
Cannot understand why Sky gave him a job - he is a one-eyed thick Herbert ?
Nothing to do with his LFC background ?
 
but thats what sky want you daft sod.
they aint stupid,they do their research,their paying public are rags and dippers predominantly,so he plays to the gallery.
it wont change any time soon.
I know what they want but if you read the thread it's about rival fans commentating on OUR games.
I also know all the blah blah about who has the most fans and who Sly endear to etc.
It's just shit why theres never a smidgen of impartiality when our club is playing
 
Today was especially disgraceful from Carragher, invented a narrative regarding our penalty which just wasn't true.

Cucurella starts the shirt pulling, Haaland brushes him off, gets away, Cucurella pulls him down and then Carragher starts spouting that it was all Haaland. Piss off!
 
Lets face it that is what it is when Caragher and Neville are the pundits.

Cant the club do ANYTHING about it? I mean for us City fans it is aaawwwwful, totally spoils the game unless you switch them off. Rival fans feel the same.

But for me, I think it is down to the club to do something about. These twats are representing our club on the national broadcasters, the first thing potential new City fans (And global fans) hear when the commentary is on City is negativity. All the way through with only cursory acknowledgement of anything positive. Its a totally unfair coverage, even taking into account how everyone is hoping we get beat this year. I can understand that, but its borderline lies that they are telling on our coverage.

The evidence is there for all (Except those blind and deaf to it), we get a shit representation on Sky Sports, cant the club order the PL to actually give us fair coverage? I mean get lawyers involved. Or is that too far?
Spitty is the problem - not Neville.
 
We’ve been given two quite clearcut penalties in our last two super Sunday games and the co commentators have made the country believe that they were somehow harsh.

MOTD didn’t even discuss the pen it was that obvious

Important to think for yourself and not just go along with commentators opinions on incidents
 
It’s almost like sky have intentionally gone out to find 2 ex rags and dipper stalwarts who still openly support the two clubs
 
Is it me or does Micah talk nonsense at times?
Micah talks nonsense most of the time and I wish he'd stop "worrying". He "worries" about Cuccurella up against Phil he "worries" about United etc. Really? Stop "worrying" Micah.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.