Riyad Mahrez

[cleavers]

We were not in for Sanchez until Jesus got injured.

Haha, apart from all last summer.

 

[Marvin]

Don't you remember deadline day of the summer transfer window?

Of course we were in for him before any injury to Jesus and but for them going back on their words he would be a blue now.

Well you can interpret it a lot of different ways. I believe what Tolmie said. City had no interest in this window up until the end by which time Utd had made an offer and we were not prepared to compete.

We did not immediately switch to Mahrez. We only moved after Sane's injury. In both cases our moves for players are I believe a reaction to first Jesus picking up a knee injury and then Sane the ankle injury. It's only my take on it. You might be right.

 

[kaz7]

this was funny 100 times ago lol,new ones please

 

[jaiguruKun]

This ffs.

Why would he be worth £40m less in four months time. He still has 2.5 years left on his contract.

 

[manimanc]

this was funny 100 times ago lol,new ones please

It's all I've got Karen...

 

[SebastianBlue]

this was funny 100 times ago lol,new ones please

 

[SebastianBlue]

Why would he be worth £40m less in four months time. He still has 2.5 years left on his contract.

I believe that prediction is predicted upon him downing tools if they do not allow him to come to us.

 

[Wolfkin]

Don't really see the point in this, plays in the same pos as Bernardo and Raheem.

 

[Yates]

Why would he be worth £40m less in four months time. He still has 2.5 years left on his contract.

Well he would technically have 2 years left and if you factor in him not playing if he is 100% wanting out or if he does play and doesn't put much effort in like Sanchez did. There's also a non existent market for Mahrez in that £90/£100M range.

 

[Neville Kneville]

Why would he be worth £40m less in four months time. He still has 2.5 years left on his contract.

Because his club have priced him out of a transfer & it's over for him.

Did you see him last year ?