Riyad Mahrez

[Mid Wales blue]

He doesn’t track back .

He might have to backtrack now!

 

[Machiavelli]

But there could well be more to it and things we do not know yet.

You should’ve just posted this tbf.

 

[cptnemo]

It didn’t meet @karen7’s exacting standards mate so that’s me and you in trouble. XD

Back to the drawing board it is then lol

 

[aguero93:20]

meh,couldn't think of a nickname anyway

Eminem.

 

[Healdplace]

You should’ve just posted this tbf.

I have - in about four previous posts.

Been saying since yesterday something was not ringing true about this story.

At first I thought we had done a deal with Leicester yesterday and were playing a game with the fee to reach the sum agreed as they had to know we would never pay the £90 m - which is not a new sum today - it was quoted from the off yesterday.

Just to show they tried to keep him and got the best sum they could in the end.

But that does not seem to be it.

Something is odd though.

 

[mscenterh750]

Can't believe I'm going to sit here and miss the match, whilst refreshing this fucking thread.

 

[deano ou812]

I explained earlier. I am mostly concerned that we reportedly encouraged the player to effectively go on strike to try to get a lower price deal.

If we did and have left him exposed I feel sorry for the lad.

If we knew Leicester wanted £90 m and we were never willing to go more than £60 m I would rather we just said no then.

Might still work, of course, as suggested above. Still don't like the tactic.

But there could well be more to it and things we do not know yet.

Good points,something doesn’t add up in all this,I’m not bothered if we sign him or not,but if we did have anything to do with him to hand transfer request in and basically go on strike then it doesn’t sit well with me this type of skullduggery,especially now as he’s fucked up now we have pulled the plug..

 

[Blue Llama]

Plenty of flappers, wums and fundamentalist wing of City's admin is crap brigade on here tonight.

 

[Machiavelli]

Plenty of flappers, wums and fundamentalist wing of City's admin is crap brigade on here tonight.

You forgot the Txiki knockers, fantasists and super sleuths.

 

[Jalfraag]

I explained earlier. I am mostly concerned that we reportedly encouraged the player to effectively go on strike to try to get a lower price deal.

If we did and have left him exposed I feel sorry for the lad.

If we knew Leicester wanted £90 m and we were never willing to go more than £60 m I would rather we just said no then.

Might still work, of course, as suggested above. Still don't like the tactic.

But there could well be more to it and things we do not know yet.

Where was it reported that we encouraged him to go on strike?