I explained earlier. I am mostly concerned that we reportedly encouraged the player to effectively go on strike to try to get a lower price deal.
If we did and have left him exposed I feel sorry for the lad.
If we knew Leicester wanted £90 m and we were never willing to go more than £60 m I would rather we just said no then.
Might still work, of course, as suggested above. Still don't like the tactic.
But there could well be more to it and things we do not know yet.
And rags,been stinking in here since last nightPlenty of flappers, wums and fundamentalist wing of City's admin is crap brigade on here tonight.
meh,couldn't think of a nickname anyway
I explained earlier. I am mostly concerned that we reportedly encouraged the player to effectively go on strike to try to get a lower price deal.
If we did and have left him exposed I feel sorry for the lad.
If we knew Leicester wanted £90 m and we were never willing to go more than £60 m I would rather we just said no then.
Might still work, of course, as suggested above. Still don't like the tactic.
But there could well be more to it and things we do not know yet.
Where was it reported that we encouraged him to go on strike?
I explained earlier. I am mostly concerned that we reportedly encouraged the player to effectively go on strike to try to get a lower price deal.
If we did and have left him exposed I feel sorry for the lad.
If we knew Leicester wanted £90 m and we were never willing to go more than £60 m I would rather we just said no then.
Might still work, of course, as suggested above. Still don't like the tactic.
But there could well be more to it and things we do not know yet.
No track back , no deal :)He might have to track back now!
You're forming your opinion on speculation and speculation alone, but seem fit to have a go at our club.
Why?
He said Mahrez was doing his bit. That's not the same thing.Inferred by Tolmie. I doubt we asked him outright.