About £25m, once they have paid us the 20%.Saints getting a massive profit on him
We will have made about £21m
About £25m, once they have paid us the 20%.Saints getting a massive profit on him
20%Will City get any money from Lavia sale ?
40 I think next year20%
And if he stays we can buy him back for £50 million next year.
Obvious decision would be wait for a season and get more minutes under his belt . All parties involved will be happy.20%
And if he stays we can buy him back for £50 million next year.
Saints getting a massive profit on him
Southampton will sell to the highest bidder, whether its us , liverpool or someone elseSo if we match dippers bid 45m less 20% cashback looking at 36m
They should go for Kovacic imo.Chelsea might go in for him now seeing Brighton wont budge on the 100m fee for Caicido
Saints getting a massive profit on him
This is all logical! But how do you answer the question - did we risk Rodri breaking down over too much game time like last CL final? As it gloriously turned out, we didnt but Lavia having just a few more games here and there, especially after the WC might have helped. But its immaterial nowBecause it may have been good for us - but not him.
He played 2,230 mins in the league for the Saints last year. For reference sake it's about the same as Bernardo (2,203) did for us.
Lavia is not on the same level as Bernardo. If he had played 2,230 minutes for us last season that would have made him the 5th highest outfield player for us.
If he had stayed with us, if we're being generous, he would have got Laporte (994) or Rico (904) mins, or if we're glass half empty Palmer (359) or Gomez (341) with most of those coming into the game as a sub when the game is finished. He wanted what we couldn't give him. Fair dos.