Rooney (MERGED)

didactic said:
We do not need Rooney, he would just cause problems in the dressing room as he is not capable of being a squad player. Tevez is our talisman the rest are his supporting cast that said we have AJ/Silva both creative. We have Ade and Balotelli both tall, strong players who will definately get you 15 goals plus a season. The team is now doing well and getting to know each other so why bring in this guy and another ego needs massaging???? Mancini will not go for him because we simply do not need him, forget the squabble with the scum or personal battles to get some one up, in logical terms it is not a good move. All those pro Rooney do you think he deserve to come in earn more than Tevez and be ahead of Tevez in the pecking order? Because that is exactly what his agent will demand and what of Balotelli is he now supposed to be 3rd choice striker now after he left the treble winners last season? Balotelli is a Rooney type player and Tevez has the energy and work ethic so where would Rooney fit in?

WE DO NOT NEED HIM.

"we have ade and balotelli"?...not seen enough of ballo,not arguing,just not seen him much yet,as for ade,he has to go.....lazy twat,shown it yesterday,can't even get back onside...for what city pay him per week,there MUST be better out there.
 
here is the youtube clip
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuXXuVqehDk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuXXuVqehDk</a>
i think anyone who says they wouldnt want Rooney at City is fecking mental!!
can you imagine the promotional campaigns!!!

WELCOME TO MANCHESTER
PARTII

hahahahahaha
 
I really think that everyone should start considering this as a very real prospect.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2010/oct/18/wayne-rooney-sir-alex-ferguson" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog ... x-ferguson</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1321675/Manchester-United-striker-Wayne-Rooney-consider-Manchester-United.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nited.html</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1321659/Wayne-Rooney-wants-leave-Manchester-United-clubs-lack-ambition.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... ition.html</a>

This is getting pretty ugly...

Rooney must know what his next move is because you don't go to war with the rags in the way that him and Stretford have done unless you're confident of what's on offer elsewhere. Madrid don't sound like they want him.

Where else does he go?
 
Variations on the theme.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1321675/Manchester-United-striker-Wayne-Rooney-consider-Manchester-United.html?ito=feeds-newsxml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... ds-newsxml</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1321659/Wayne-Rooney-wants-leave-Manchester-United-clubs-lack-ambition.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... ition.html</a>
 
BillyShears said:
I really think that everyone should start considering this as a very real prospect.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2010/oct/18/wayne-rooney-sir-alex-ferguson" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog ... x-ferguson</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1321675/Manchester-United-striker-Wayne-Rooney-consider-Manchester-United.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nited.html</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1321659/Wayne-Rooney-wants-leave-Manchester-United-clubs-lack-ambition.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... ition.html</a>

This is getting pretty ugly...

Rooney must know what his next move is because you don't go to war with the rags in the way that him and Stretford have done unless you're confident of what's on offer elsewhere. Madrid don't sound like they want him.

Where else does he go?

TO A PROSTITUTE.....
 
IMO if the only attackers we have on our books were Ballo, Tevez and Silva I recon that would be enough given how Bert sets up our tactics, the likes of Jo, RSC, Ade Big Phil, Bellamy, Onouha all surplus to requirements but he will try to keep them until next summer ( I know some are on loan) then you will see clearout when their sales actually benefit club, which they won't do in January.
 
didactic said:
We do not need Rooney, he would just cause problems in the dressing room as he is not capable of being a squad player. Tevez is our talisman the rest are his supporting cast that said we have AJ/Silva both creative. We have Ade and Balotelli both tall, strong players who will definately get you 15 goals plus a season. The team is now doing well and getting to know each other so why bring in this guy and another ego needs massaging???? Mancini will not go for him because we simply do not need him, forget the squabble with the scum or personal battles to get some one up, in logical terms it is not a good move. All those pro Rooney do you think he deserve to come in earn more than Tevez and be ahead of Tevez in the pecking order? Because that is exactly what his agent will demand and what of Balotelli is he now supposed to be 3rd choice striker now after he left the treble winners last season? Balotelli is a Rooney type player and Tevez has the energy and work ethic so where would Rooney fit in?

WE DO NOT NEED HIM.
agree 100% Id fear another Rodney Marsh moment
 
Bloody Nora, this is getting out of hand.

Agreed, but to some it is another fine example of the rags breaking up, another bit falling off and for some blues it is rather nice to see those fuckers squirm a bit, so it generates interest and to be fair we have been linked with him and it seems there is a consensus of opinion which suggests we don't want shrek.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.