alky313 said:
Stoned Rose said:
He isn't a midfielder and therefore cannot possibly be 'a complete midfielder'. Lets move on before it gets silly.
We can move on before I prove you know very little about football... or how positions on a chart are far different from tracking a player in an actual game. Carry on in your deluded world of 4-4-2's and Football Manager. Should I make a meme for that?
Don't worry about the Stoned Rose alky313 , if you bother to read our exchange on the Chelski v Royals thread you will soon see that it doesn't take long for Stony to spiral into the world of the gif and jpeg.
I asked him two basic questions and within a minute of him reading my post he tried the old you know nothing about football line , got personal again and giffed and poorly spellchecked his way into everything bar addressing the question.
The reason he does this is because he is not capable of supporting his gross generalisations with any factual evidence whatsoever.
Your thoughts on Rooney are very close to the mark.
Rooney is more than capable of holding down a position behind the strikers or main striker in a top team and can easily fill that role at Manure with great effect or out wide , he can even play "wingback" if required to.
Like most strikers he loves scoring goals but I doubt very much the arrival of Van Persie will have nearly as much negative impact at what the press and scribes think it will.
He wanted to leave largely because he felt the owners were not doing their upmost to match his ambitions for the club and he knew the noisy neighbours were more than noisy and low and behold he was proved correct.
He may be a simpleton off the field but he has a brain born for the game and is one player I would love to have at our club realising of course it will never happen , well not while fergie is alive anyway.