Royal Wedding

No they don't...... its the buildings, associated events such as changing of the guard and the lands that attract tourists. Look at France they haven't had a royal family since the revolution yet the Palace of Versaille brings in a fortune (despite entry being free)

The poster I was debating with who’s disappeared now was arguing it was the money for the buildings and land they received, that was his main gripe!

I’ve been to the Palace of The Versailles, it’s not difficult to see why it brings in so much attention.

I’d argue there’d be even more people that would go if they had a Royal Family still in there.

But that’s all speculation, France is a different country and we don’t know if revenue would still be maintained if we got rid of them.

What we do know though is that the current set up is beneficial financially to the country, or at least that’s what the accounting 3rd parties tell us.

Couple that in with tradition and our identity, I feel there isn’t a reasonable debate to remove the Royal Family.

Anti-Royalists are just anti-British left wingers who want to turn us into a Republic Socialist society, I just wish they’d be more forthcoming and grow a backbone rather than giving this vague and unfounded argument about how much the Royals cost.
 
That wasn’t your original point though is it?

As I’ve said regardless of what they get via the taxpayer to maintain the house, it seems to be worth more for the country to have them than not.

You simply don’t like them because of what they stand for because you’re a Republican.

Fuck me you're hard work.
My first post said they they would be staying in a house paid for by taxpayers did it not?
Then you ask me if i know this and i replied 'Yes'.
Now which part 'wasn't my original point' ?
 
Anti-Royalists are just anti-British left wingers who want to turn us into a Republic Socialist society, I just wish they’d be more forthcoming and grow a backbone rather than giving this vague and unfounded argument about how much the Royals cost.
Spot on.
 
Fuck me you're hard work.
My first post said they they would be staying in a house paid for by taxpayers did it not?
Then you ask me if i know this and i replied 'Yes'.
Now which part 'wasn't my original point' ?

Oh look he’s back. Hello mate.

The above poster said it’s not the Royal Family but the land, estates, events etc. that bring in the tourism.

Can you see why I brought up your post?

My argument is that it pays for itself, it’s very easy to understand.
 
Last edited:
She has already got the old farts to relax,she was at charlies garden party yesterday and harry was giving a speech and got buzzed by a bee,she started laughing followed by charlie and that wife of his,don't see that happen usually,breath of fresh air she is
 
She has already got the old farts to relax,she was at charlies garden party yesterday and harry was giving a speech and got buzzed by a bee,she started laughing followed by charlie and that wife of his,don't see that happen usually,breath of fresh air she is
''that wife of his'

What's she done to make you refer to her as that?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.