Rudd quits

Seriously? You can’t make a case as to why Robinson isn’t a racist? I expected some effort. Ah well. It was tough ask.

No, because even if we provided 10,000 quotes and pieces of evidence showing that he wasn't racist, you could say that they didn't correspond with something you reckon you've seen and therefore it's all redundant.

Prove that there isn't a God.
 
No, because even if we provided 10,000 quotes and pieces of evidence showing that he wasn't racist, you could say that they didn't correspond with something you reckon you've seen and therefore it's all redundant.

Prove that there isn't a God.
Ferguson and Charlton both still breathing.
 
It wasn’t a claim. It was a statement of fact. I’ll leave it to his minions to disprove this fact. Good luck. You’ll need it.

No, it’s an opinion, whether you’re right or wrong it’s still on you to provide evidence.

If I said Corbyn is working for the KGB and it’s a fact, you’d quite rightly expect evidence.
 
A Cambridge University graduate with a below average intelligence...
And yet that’s no defence for Boris!!

You cannot watch any of her interviews and believe she is anything other than a fucking idiot. Although maybe you can, I guess it’s all about perspective.
 
And yet that’s no defence for Boris!!

You cannot watch any of her interviews and believe she is anything other than a fucking idiot. Although maybe you can, I guess it’s all about perspective.

I don’t recall ever calling Boris stupid (although I probably have). Incompetent. Ignorant. Clown. But not stupid. He is clearly intelligent. Just the dangerous kind.

You don’t graduate from a top university like Cambridge unless you have a certain level of intelligence and determination.
 
Theresa May's plan to tackle housing crisis dismissed savaged by senior Tories: 'Nonsense'....

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ail-britain-speech-tory-warning-a8240061.html

General election 2017: Tory housing plan 'paid from existing budget'....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-39911569

Tory backlash against Theresa May's housing measures begins...

http://www.cityam.com/281655/tory-backlash-against-theresa-mays-housing-measures-begins

As expected, all smoke and mirrors.

Well for a start the final article is largely asking the housing minister to build up not on new land. He implemented a policy on that only weeks ago to much acclaim so effectively did what he was being asked to do in the final article. This was heavily publicised. Not much more needs to be said on that one.

The first article is saying nothing more than we need more homes - we are building more than we have in a generation. Homes England are also building and developing directly by partnering up with developers which again is what is called for in the article. Nothing else needs to be said on it.

The middle article is superseded as significant new funds to the tune of 9 billion have been allocated for new home building.

The 3 articles are extremely limited in content and fact.

I could list tens of jobs in Manchester alone funded by the Manchester devolution housing fund. The two huge ones at the entrance to deansgate being the most evident. The housing fund is also being diverted under the stewarship of Andy burnham to build significant affordable housing in suburbia. 300 million of devolution money recycled 5 times will mean a 1.5 billion housing fund is working in Manchester as we speak.

On top of this I requote Sajid Javids full speech. This sums up what he has achieved in this role.

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/sajid-javids-speech-on-the-housing-market

I suggest you read the full speech - it really does show the quality intelligence empathy and commitment of the man.

Once you have read it could you be so kind as to say where you think he may be going wrong? And what would you or let’s say dianne the toilet cleaner (or any other menial job) Abbott do better than a self made millionaire intellectual son of an immigrant bus driver? (From Rochdale I might add!)

I apologise for posting this 15 minutes ahead of my 10 pm deadline.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well for a start the final article is largely asking the housing minister to build up not on new land. He implemented policy on that only weeks ago to much acclaim so effectively did what he was being asked to do in the final article. This was heavily publicised. Not much more needs to be said on that one.

The first article is saying nothing more than we need more homes - we are building more than we have in a generation. Homes England are also building and developing directly by partnering up with developers which again is what is called for in the article.
Evening WW. How was your swim?
 
I don’t recall ever calling Boris stupid (although I probably have). Incompetent. Ignorant. Clown. But not stupid. He is clearly intelligent. Just the dangerous kind.

You don’t graduate from a top university like Cambridge unless you have a certain level of intelligence and determination.
I know plenty of former Oxbridge idiots to be fair but if you want to put her on a pedestal because she went to a half decent uni then knock yourself out.

Whatever brain cells she have had have clearly left her. Did you even watch the interview? Can you defend it? Or must you simply point to three years in her life neigh on two generations ago?
 
Evening WW. How was your swim?

Good evening mr sweep. It was excellent thank you. A brisk 32 lengths (brisk for me anyway) after a rather relaxing day fucking about on Bluemoon interrupted by a “very important meeting” (I only do important ones) with a “huge housing fund” (I only deal with huge funds) and then a bit of a laugh at dianne Abbott. Then I spent about two minutes reviewing fumbles 3 shite links. Think my rabbit could have dissected them to be honest. They were even weaker than I thought.

I don’t think he has even read them - if he had he wouldn’t have posted them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know plenty of former Oxbridge idiots to be fair but if you want to put her on a pedestal because she went to a half decent uni then knock yourself out.

Whatever brain cells she have had have clearly left her. Did you even watch the interview? Can you defend it? Or must you simply point to three years in her life neigh on two generations ago?

As I have already said, it is not possible to graduate from a top university if you have a below average intelligence. She is far more intelligent and accomplished than the vast majority of people throwing crude insults at her.

You can disagree with her, but to call her clinically stupid says more about you than it does her.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top