Rudd quits

It wasn’t The Perfect Fumble’s Twitter page was it?

Why would he have to ban them even if they are fascist?

I don’t think they are fascist in it’s true definition by the way, nor do I think they’re anywhere near as dangerous as other fascist groups but they do display some fascist traits, which is massively ironic when you think about what they claim to be.

If he goes after the Jayda's and Tommy's of this world he will go back up in my estimation, problem is he is concentrating his commons speaches on the wrong groups
 
If he goes after the Jayda's and Tommy's of this world he will go back up in my estimation, problem is he is concentrating his commons speaches on the wrong groups

I don’t agree with Tommy Robinson but I support his right to free speech.

He should only be going after groups who pose a physical threat to the country, not someone expressing their political/ideological views only.
 
This was on here a year ago.
This is a thread about The former and new home sec. Dont derail the thread again. You did a good job of that last time.

Rudd or Javid anyone?

Has to be Javid if only because the racists on social media are having a melt and predicting Sharia law will be introduced within a month. Outside of the entertainment value of appointing a Muslim Home Sec I doubt much will change but we’ll find out soon enough.
 
Last edited:
I don’t think they are fascist in it’s true definition by the way, nor do I think they’re anywhere near as dangerous as other fascist groups but they do display some fascist traits, which is massively ironic when you think about what they claim to be.
Agreed. One of the key definitions of fascism is opposition to Marxism, socialism and communism. To describe a left-wing organisation, no matter how extreme, as fascist is ridiculous. What people seem to actually mean when they use 'fascist' is 'authoritarian.' You don't have to be a fascist to be an authoritarian, as all of history's left-wing dictators would tell you.
 
i read them all - i deal with Homes England on a weekly basis and am now leaving this forum today to go and meet a pension fund investing in property in this City. I know what i am talking about on this and they have done a very good job on housing. You may call them elsewhere but this man is a decent and good principled man. As i said give him a chnace.

You got back quickly!

I've noticed you never critique anything, you blurt something out then run off to some very important meeting.

Not unlike "price of everything value of nothing" broken record chippy boy
 
You got back quickly!

I've noticed you never critique anything, you blurt something out then run off to some very important meeting.

Not unlike "price of everything value of nothing" broken record chippy boy

He sure does love telling us about his ‘important meetings’.

For the record I’m off for a very important ‘cup of tea and leisurely wank break’ at 3:30 pm. Outside of that my schedule is clear.
 


d454bf8c78201e1cd4316d380750e1cf8c6908ec_00.gif
 
If he goes after the Jayda's and Tommy's of this world he will go back up in my estimation, problem is he is concentrating his commons speaches on the wrong groups
Don't think Tommy does anything wrong, everything he says is the truth. He is very well versed on the issues he discusses. he was speaking about muslim rape gangs years ago and was called racist for saying it, it is now an extremely common news feature.
 
You got back quickly!

I've noticed you never critique anything, you blurt something out then run off to some very important meeting.

Not unlike "price of everything value of nothing" broken record chippy boy

I can post from a phone but I posted that before I set off anyway. When did I last rush off to an important meeting and state it on here. I nipped from Ancoats today at 1pm for an hour long meeting on Deansgate and am now back in Ancoats? It that ok with you?

Don't think I have ever said I am off to an important meeting or indeed a meeting of any sort before at any point in nearly ten years on here before today so you are talking nonsense once again to deflect from the fact that you think you are the expert on Tory housing policy as you found 3 negative articles on the internet and I made you look a bit silly when answering your initial question as to why he was a good housing minister with a series of facts and figures.

Facts that as an entrenched labour man you cant give any credit whatsoever to the Conservatives - ever.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.