D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
There was a short spell last decade where the third man in tackles were being called ‘snapping the pole’. The saying kind of disappeared but is actually a very apposite representation for the dangerous nature of the tackle.The officials thought it was a legitimate tackle (and it may well have been under the current rules) but pundits described it as an illegal hip drop tackle. IMHO, third man tackles from the side of the leg have been risking knee injuries all season. The ball carrier is much more vulnerable than the tackler as they have no real way of defending themselves. In a different way, it reminds of tacklers using pressure against knee joints to roll players out of the ruck in rugby Union that had to be addressed because of a plethora of serious leg injuries.
Which I think comes from the Melbourne Storm/Craig Bellamy culture of defence: two men tackle the upper body, hold him up as long as possible, a third man is hanging around waiting for the ref to shout the ‘HE…’ of ‘HEEEEEELD’ and he then dives into the lower body to snap the pole and they take him down, they lie on for a few seconds (this ends up being about four seconds after the ref has shouted ‘held’ which should be a penalty but rarely is) and their defensive line is always set.
Some people will say that’s good defence and it could be if the attacker was still moving, but when the attacker is stationary all his lower body joints become vulnerable and it doesn’t matter if the tackle comes in at the thighs, the hip and knee joints are open to weight induced injury. Also the time it takes all this to happen means rugby isn’t being played and the game as a spectacle isn’t as good.
And hip-drops, even on moving targets, can be career ending. They’re very dangerous and were never part of rugby league as far as I can remember until the last decade.
Last edited by a moderator: