aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
We're fine going forward but can be surprisingly vulnerable in defence.
The amount of missed tackles yesterday was atrocious. (Luke Fitzgerald, in particular, must think the job is beneath him).
And you're right to some extent about the centres. The back row aren't getting out to fill the gaps as quickly as they should on the opposition ball but that doesn't excuse missed first tackles.
If D'Arcy (great servant that he has been) goes to the World Cup it'll point to just how weak we are in that area. The guy couldn't get a game last year, yet he was togging out for his country last night? That said, if Earls stays fit (and is given better defensive support from the back row than we've seen in the last two games), he's about as good a replacement as you'll ever get for O' Driscoll (inasmuch as you could ever replace that man). Sadly, there's nothing in Keith's track record to suggest that he will withstand a punishing World Cup schedule. Basically, if you pick him (and he is the best option) you've got to plan on a back up as a probability. Hence, D'Arcy getting the call up, I suppose. It really is a conundrum for Joel Schmidt.
And it's a shame because we're really not that far off the mark at all.
2 centres off. :) That vulnerability in defence is coming from over committing in attack to compensate for a lack of creativity imo. The tackling/binding issue was a huge problem for all the teams in the 6 nations and none of them appear to have sorted it yet, hence my opinion that it's a SH team that'll win it.