urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,832
Most national anthems are jingoistic, it's the nature of the beast.
The Internationale isn't/wasn't and nither is spains, andorras or San Marinos ;-)
Most national anthems are jingoistic, it's the nature of the beast.
A lot of people think the line is Britannia RULES the waves ie an arrogant statement of our superiority. The word RULE here, is an exhortation to not allows our nation to become subservient to others.To thee belongs the rural reign;
Thy cities shall with commerce shine:
Is it a song that serves capitalism or does it make you proud to be British?
"Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:
"Britons never will be slaves."
As a nation that has a rich history, it fascinates me how we portray ourselves and how we are portrayed by others. I love my country and I wonder if these songs are relevant and how much they play on our nations noggins today.
Is this wokery nonsense from me, or does it have legs.
Certainly I agree with the dirge of our current anthem, just an adoration of the queen (and Charles to come). Jerusalem is a fine tune, also Land of hope, Nimrod etc. However, I personally would like any change in the lyrics to specifically exclude any religious reference to gods or heavens, any individuals, and instead just be about the country.Everyone of which is a million times better than the dirge that currently serves as our national anthem. If changing the national anthem and pledging allegiance to some woman is too difficult to change then, as a minimum, we should have one of them as a English anthem. Like you, my preference would be for Jerusalem.
"Must, in their turn, to tyrants fallCertainly I agree with the dirge of our current anthem, just an adoration of the queen (and Charles to come). Jerusalem is a fine tune, also Land of hope, Nimrod etc. However, I personally would like any change in the lyrics to specifically exclude any religious reference to gods or heavens, any individuals, and instead just be about the country.
Not sure if James Thornton knew much about international commerce in 1740. I think this particular chorus is simply saying England will fare better than "lesser nations" . A little chauvinistic perhaps."Must, in their turn, to tyrants fall
While thou shalt flourish, shalt flourish great and free"
Are the above lines a paean to free market capitalism?
Good pointNot sure if James Thornton knew much about international commerce in 1740. I think this particular chorus is simply saying England will fare better than "lesser nations" . A little chauvinistic perhaps.
It’s just a British anthem. Some people love it like City fans love “Blue Moon”, West Ham fans love “Blowing Bubbles”, Rolling Stones fans love “Satisfaction”. It’s just a song and something that shouldn’t be read into too much.To thee belongs the rural reign;
Thy cities shall with commerce shine:
Is it a song that serves capitalism or does it make you proud to be British?
"Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:
"Britons never will be slaves."
As a nation that has a rich history, it fascinates me how we portray ourselves and how we are portrayed by others. I love my country and I wonder if these songs are relevant and how much they play on our nations noggins today.
Is this wokery nonsense from me, or does it have legs.