denislawsbackheel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 May 2008
- Messages
- 26,114
- Team supported
- We went to Rotherham…
You could ask that of any NATO country.Indeed but perhaps the effectiveness of NATO is measured by the countries within it and that is dominated US defence power which they all get a share in. So yeah no-one really pays for NATO but we all know who really pays for it in terms of resources. If you remove that US power then your effectiveness and capability drops to virtually nothing really so what will this EU army achieve?
People just take what the US brings for granted and think it's a given but there's no chance that they'll accept collaboration and sharing without having influence, especially as some EU countries aren't in NATO. Why would they for example accept France spending more money and resources on an EU army instead of it spending to fulfil its commitments to NATO?
More importantly at the moment - why would the US continue to pay for and operate ballistic missile defence sites in Poland and Romania when European countries are going off to start their own army specifically to remain outside of the influence of the US? If I was the US I'd pack up my site and say you're on your own.
Another question, if the US was attacked then would France strike back as required by their commitment to NATO? What happens if the EU army says no?
Even us.