Russian invasion of Ukraine

He is an inadequate person, because an adequate person cannot go to war against another state on a full scale. He is inadequate or knew that he would not get anything for it. And, therefore, there were various dialogues with other countries. I don't even want to think about it, because then it's not a partnership, but a back game and complete betrayal. Therefore, let's still think that he did not have agreements, but he is simply inadequate, who decided that no one will protect Ukraine, and he can seize us and destroy us.
 


Zelenskyi still speaking

It is high time to allow #Ukraine to use Western weapons (without restrictions) on Russian territory. The strategic nonsense of not granting this permission is dangerously naive, it only helps #Putin and does NOT prevent an escalation of the war. On the contrary: not granting this permission CAUSES the escalation of the war.Because anyone who speaks out against the use of weapons on Russian territory (with the purpose of destroying Russia's militarily relevant infrastructure and supply routes) is automatically speaking out FOR leaving Russia's terror capabilities INTACT, so that Russia can continue its aggression largely unhindered until Ukraine ("hopefully", according to the calculation of Putin's friends) "runs out of soldiers".

❗️
The most effective mechanism for de-escalating the war is to end this completely absurd "territorial immunity" of Russian terror capabilities, so that attacks against the (currently ONLY militarily active) bastion of Western freedom against Russia (THIS BASTION IS UKRAINE) can no longer be carried out undisturbed from a secure territory.Absolutely NOBODY defends Europe (and NATO) as relatively inexpensively as Ukraine, do we really want to risk its defeat, so that the war comes to NATO-territory and becomes REALLY expensive?

❗️
It is a fact: if Putin is not stopped in Ukraine, he will continue to expand militarily against the West, because just as Hitler's military expansion plans against the East were laid down in "Mein Kampf" (and hardly anyone - especially not Chamberlain - wanted to admit this until it was too late), Putin's military expansion plans against the West are laid down in his doctrine "Russkiy Mir" (and - for example - Scholz, the new Chamberlain, does not want to admit it).We must not allow this "Russkiy Mir" doctrine to be successful. We have to allow Ukraine to do what is necessary. That's in the best interest of humanity, because a Russian defeat is in the best interest of humanity.

❗️
Furthermore, despite all Russian propaganda, there is NO RISK OF ANY "NUCLEAR ESCALATION":Russia has never been as EXTREMELY inferior to NATO as it is today.The Russian Air Force does not even have full air sovereignty over Ukraine, planes are repeatedly shot down, and all this despite the fact that the Russian Air Force is many times larger than the Ukrainian one.NATO's air force, in turn, is MUCH larger than Russia's, so Putin knows how quickly NATO could (in case of a nuclear conflict) not just destroy missile launching pads, but also descend on Moscow and St. Petersburg and any other important city with tactical and strategic nuclear weapons.
❗️
Since Putin knows this, it is inevitably clear to him that he can only use the "nuclear threat" as a scare tactic, but NEVER as a real military option.So.Let us do what is necessary. Let us supply Ukraine with all the weapons it needs in order to destroy Russian supply routes as well as Russian terror capabilities. Because THIS will end the war
 
A good hit...Luhansk Airfield.

Slava Ukraini.

View attachment 120493
Was there anything of note there ? On google earth it looks disused (2/10/2021), other than an aviation museum. There another airfiels a bit south of it (2/06/19) that looks more in use, but all the buildings there look to have been demolished (bombed).

Obviously they could have built new since both those dates, but that looks a significant explosion for what looks (on google earth) like a none event airfield.

Also, have you any idea what the people of Luhansk think of the russian occupation ? Is there opposition, it's been 10 years now.
 
Was there anything of note there ? On google earth it looks disused (2/10/2021), other than an aviation museum. There another airfiels a bit south of it (2/06/19) that looks more in use, but all the buildings there look to have been demolished (bombed).

Obviously they could have built new since both those dates, but that looks a significant explosion for what looks (on google earth) like a none event airfield.

Also, have you any idea what the people of Luhansk think of the russian occupation ? Is there opposition, it's been 10 years now.
Aircraft repair centre,aviation command posts and aviation training centre.

Slava Ukraini.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.