ultimateharold
Well-Known Member
Take a listen/read of this
Take a listen/read of this
Except they did, just yesterday, after the weapons were used.Or more accurately ‘we have acquiesced to all of America’s demand on usage’ - ie no destroying oil facilities deep inside Russia
The Ukrainians don't need ATACMS to destroy oil terminals. They have their own weapons for thatOr more accurately ‘we have acquiesced to all of America’s demand on usage’ - ie no destroying oil facilities deep inside Russia and jeopardising the supply of cheap oil late in an election year….
The Ukrainians don't need ATACMS to destroy oil terminals. They have their own weapons for that
There were, hopefully Ukraine told them to mind their own business.There were reports that the Us asked Ukraine to stop doing it as it caused oil price issues.
The Ukrainians don't need ATACMS to destroy oil terminals. They have their own weapons for that
There’s a big difference in hitting a ‘small’ terminal with a drone and sending an ATACMS to Primorsk or Novorossiysk which I have no doubt is a red line for the US as those terminals going offline would cause a big price spike close to an election.Except they did, just yesterday, after the weapons were used.
Price of oil will not concern Ukraine if it helps their causeThere’s a big difference in hitting a ‘small’ terminal with a drone and sending an ATACMS to Primorsk or Novorossiysk which I have no doubt is a red line for the US as those terminals going offline would cause a big price spike close to an election.