SteWadda
Well-Known Member
Markt85 said:
Nothing and he says there is nothing wrong with it.
But why go back to the same school where it all has to be explained to primary shcool kids.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Sack Richard Littlejohn ...
- Thread starter BlueHammer85
- Start date
Nothing and he says there is nothing wrong with it.
But why go back to the same school where it all has to be explained to primary shcool kids.
nijinsky's fetlocks
Well-Known Member
He is a complete and utter twat,writing for a newspaper aimed at and read by complete and utter twats,and anyone who agrees with his vicious bile is also a complete and utter twat.
BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 36,507
SteWadda said:Markt85 said:SteWadda said:The bloke is a twat but is there proof they committed sucide because of his article?
Also I agreed with his atricle.
what is wrong with a transgender teaching pupils ?
Nothing and he says there is nothing wrong with it.
But why go back to the same school where it all has to be explained to primary shcool kids.
It is better to educate kids for the world they live in rather than the one we wish them to live in, that way leads to acceptance and tolerance.
SteWadda
Well-Known Member
Markt85 said:SteWadda said:Markt85 said:what is wrong with a transgender teaching pupils ?
Nothing and he says there is nothing wrong with it.
But why go back to the same school where it all has to be explained to primary shcool kids.
It is better to educate kids for the world they live in rather than the one we wish them to live in, that way leads to acceptance and tolerance.
I have no intention of discussing transgenders with my 6 year old in the near future. If he went to the school where this teacher was I would have to.
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
nijinsky's fetlocks said:He is a complete and utter twat,writing for a newspaper aimed at and read by complete and utter twats,and anyone who agrees with his vicious bile is also a complete and utter twat.
well said.
BimboBob
Well-Known Member
Heard of his name but have no idea who he is. Off my radar.
The press clearly made this person's life a misery. If they didn't get the media attention, the snipes from Littlejohn and the like, the need to constantly lie low, they might've been able to live a normal life. The Mail were offering payment to parents in return for pictures for fuck's sakeSteWadda said:The bloke is a twat but is there proof they committed sucide because of his article?
Also I agreed with his atricle.
Where is the public interest? Who honestly gives a shite about their kids being taught by a trans person so long as they teach them well? Sadly the Daily Fail were always going to take this kind of line, and Littlejohn is known for this kind of thing. For every good paper/story in this country you have several gutter stories like this one preaching hate, intolerance, homophobia and the like. I'd take great pleasure in seeing the mail die.
Davs 19
Well-Known Member
ban-mcfc said:nijinsky's fetlocks said:He is a complete and utter twat,writing for a newspaper aimed at and read by complete and utter twats,and anyone who agrees with his vicious bile is also a complete and utter twat.
well said.
I don't know. I think there should have been several more twats in there.
Also, wasn't he the twat that bad mouthed Manchester and when confronted on live tv about it, ran like no tail ?
No offence meant ladies......l
intheknow!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Jan 2011
- Messages
- 1,262
What has happened to free speech?
Even if you disagree with someone, why shouldn't they be allowed to say it? This Country is becoming ridiculous.
These 'trans' media watch people are always starting witch hunts against journalists they have taken offence from. Only a couple of months ago they started a campaign against the long time feminist writer Suzanne Moore for a perceived slight.
It's tragic that someone has committed suicide but no-one does that just because of an article.
Even if you disagree with someone, why shouldn't they be allowed to say it? This Country is becoming ridiculous.
These 'trans' media watch people are always starting witch hunts against journalists they have taken offence from. Only a couple of months ago they started a campaign against the long time feminist writer Suzanne Moore for a perceived slight.
It's tragic that someone has committed suicide but no-one does that just because of an article.