dazdon
Well-Known Member
The bloke may be a knob but he's got an opinion at least.
And he isn't responsible for someone deciding to off themselves.
And he isn't responsible for someone deciding to off themselves.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Sack Richard Littlejohn ...
- Thread starter BlueHammer85
- Start date
TCIB
Well-Known Member
His views seem archaic and to old hat.
However as shit and nasty a piece that is he has a right to air his views.
Personally very young children would struggle to understand such things and i can understand that.
Maybe teach older kids who can comprehend the situation better ?
The type of mentality widely found with people who have sex changes does seem to have a high suicide rate.
I only know that as 2 lads i knew a bit (i do mean just a little bit) who did, offed themselves years ago.
Totally seperate people with no contact together, both did themselves in seemingly with a small thing just being the straw that broke the camels back.
I feel terribly bad for the mind that feels so trapped it makes people do this.
Religion has a lot to answer for regarding this as they still seem stuck at accepting people can be gay.
However as shit and nasty a piece that is he has a right to air his views.
Personally very young children would struggle to understand such things and i can understand that.
Maybe teach older kids who can comprehend the situation better ?
The type of mentality widely found with people who have sex changes does seem to have a high suicide rate.
I only know that as 2 lads i knew a bit (i do mean just a little bit) who did, offed themselves years ago.
Totally seperate people with no contact together, both did themselves in seemingly with a small thing just being the straw that broke the camels back.
I feel terribly bad for the mind that feels so trapped it makes people do this.
Religion has a lot to answer for regarding this as they still seem stuck at accepting people can be gay.
dannybcity
Well-Known Member
intheknow! said:What has happened to free speech?
Even if you disagree with someone, why shouldn't they be allowed to say it? This Country is becoming ridiculous.
These 'trans' media watch people are always starting witch hunts against journalists they have taken offence from. Only a couple of months ago they started a campaign against the long time feminist writer Suzanne Moore for a perceived slight.
It's tragic that someone has committed suicide but no-one does that just because of an article.
So it's okay for Littlejohn to call for this teacher to be sacked but not ok to call for him to be? The man's an odious bell end, he hates everyone and everything that doesn't fit with his view of the world.
Freedom of speech yadayadayada.
I don't see why personal issues need to be aired in a public forum.
Particularly those of someone so insignificant.
Looks like he was just looking to pick a fight with someone in a vulnerable situation to me. A true coward.
I don't see why personal issues need to be aired in a public forum.
Particularly those of someone so insignificant.
Looks like he was just looking to pick a fight with someone in a vulnerable situation to me. A true coward.
dazdon
Well-Known Member
intheknow! said:What has happened to free speech?
Even if you disagree with someone, why shouldn't they be allowed to say it? This Country is becoming ridiculous.
These 'trans' media watch people are always starting witch hunts against journalists they have taken offence from. Only a couple of months ago they started a campaign against the long time feminist writer Suzanne Moore for a perceived slight.
It's tragic that someone has committed suicide but no-one does that just because of an article.
To be fair Suzanne Moore is a man hating tragedy so i'm not surprised the transfolk hate her guts.
Bindel and Moore are the unshaven munters who decided that male to female transexuals can't be feminists and that they should be excluded from all feminist issues.
<a class="postlink" href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100197903/feminists-versus-transexuals-julie-burchill-suzanne-moore-and-the-observer-spark-civil-war-on-the-left/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timst ... -the-left/</a>
BoyBlue_1985
Well-Known Member
Considering the daily mail published another article of his today I would say neither him or the paper really give a shitmancunial said:I would like to know what and how littlejohn feels and thinks after this tragic circumstance!
nijinsky's fetlocks
Well-Known Member
BoyBlue_1985 said:Considering the daily mail published another article of his today I would say neither him or the paper really give a shitmancunial said:I would like to know what and how littlejohn feels and thinks after this tragic circumstance!
In a nutshell.
Any publicity is good publicity to this odious bell end and his equally obnoxious paymasters.
All he will do now is move on to targeting the next minority group for his repulsive bigotry that reinforces and panders to the prejudices of his middle England readership.
He knows his target demographic,and gives them what they want.
What I want is for him to be anally raped to death by an irate bull elephant.
mancunial said:I would like to know what and how littlejohn feels and thinks after this tragic circumstance!
My guess would be he's buzzing about all the publicity the death has afforded him.
He's been dining out on coining the phrase, two Jags, for 20 years so probably needs a new angle.
intheknow! said:What has happened to free speech?
Even if you disagree with someone, why shouldn't they be allowed to say it? This Country is becoming ridiculous.
These 'trans' media watch people are always starting witch hunts against journalists they have taken offence from. Only a couple of months ago they started a campaign against the long time feminist writer Suzanne Moore for a perceived slight.
It's tragic that someone has committed suicide but no-one does that just because of an article.
Nothing.
Nothing at all has happened to free speech. Nobody at all is arguing against Richard Littlejohn's right to free speech. What's in question is the magnitude of his platform. Hence, the thread title reads "sack rj" not "burn rj at the stake".