Sagna fined 40K for social media post.

He's got until Friday 5pm to reply, he should wait until a minute before the deadline before sending them an email saying '****s'.
 
Taken from the Sky News report "FA rule E3 states that 'comments about match officials which imply bias, [or] attack the officials' integrity' can be considered in breach of this rule."
Response: It was a lighthearted remark made with reference to City being down to 10 men and Burnley's remarkable fighting spirit. There was absolutely no intention to imply bias or lack of integrity on the part of the officials and any interpretation to that effect would be regrettable but wrong.
 
Corrupt bastards should sort their own fucking bent league out first.

Yes finally we are having VT that will not only highlight how poor the refs are but also will highlight the bias in refs to favour sides like Manure , Chelsea , Arsenal , Liverpool and Tottenham.

Marcotti in his wisdom is trying to point out the top six are getting stronger with the gap between them growing alarmingly and the gap between the top six and those below.

How about he get to the crux of the matter and tell it like it is which of course he won't because he risks losing his " accreditation".

The sending off of the West Ham player after 15 minutes when at worst Jones should been shown yellow but shown a red in all fairness changed the game completely.

More and more bent refs have to be weeded out of the game completely and VT is one way some of them will be that end up in China.

FFS Sagna is asked a please explain for a tongue in cheek comment on social media yet no refs will be sanctioned for the pitiful display at COMS and West Ham.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.