KennyG
Well-Known Member
Re: Sagna
Serge Aurier is the future. Ivorian
Serge Aurier is the future. Ivorian
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Sagna signing confirmed (page 109)
- Thread starter Daz_Blue
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Re: Sagna
I confess that I haven't read all of this thread, but where has the idea that we are going to pay him £100K p/w come from? I know that that is what he reportedly wanted from Arsenal, but do we know for a fact that we have offered him that? Given our move toward incentive based contracts, I would have expected us to offer him significantly less than £100K, perhaps with a signing on fee and bonuses.
Very good player IMO, would be an excellent signing.
Blue Haze said:Tron Coltrane said:Hihosilva said:He's just not good enough for us
Not trying to be adversarial here, even though I completely disagree, but who would you have us sign? Is that person going to be content with playing second fiddle to Zabba? And how much will they cost us?
I'm open to the idea there are better options than Sagna, I'm just stuck trying to think of one. Top 5 RB in the league this season and available for free.
Exactly
We can sign a younger player on lower wages, say 70k instead of 100k. He will have to be unproven to get wages that low. And even if we do, a difference of 30k over a 3-year contract is only 4.6m. The fee for a quality young right back will be at least 3x that. And good luck finding a young player willing to sit behind Zabaleta.
I confess that I haven't read all of this thread, but where has the idea that we are going to pay him £100K p/w come from? I know that that is what he reportedly wanted from Arsenal, but do we know for a fact that we have offered him that? Given our move toward incentive based contracts, I would have expected us to offer him significantly less than £100K, perhaps with a signing on fee and bonuses.
Very good player IMO, would be an excellent signing.
meeesh
Well-Known Member
Re: Sagna
It will be me a minimum of 100k a week,as he apparently turned down the new deal of 70k at Arsenal,that's the reason he's coming,and that reason only
It will be me a minimum of 100k a week,as he apparently turned down the new deal of 70k at Arsenal,that's the reason he's coming,and that reason only
Re: Sagna
We could piss off Arsenal.....
KennyG said:Serge Aurier is the future. Ivorian
We could piss off Arsenal.....
Blue Haze
Well-Known Member
Re: Sagna
It's just a rumour, but reported in just about every article. Apparently he turned down 80k and Arsenal say that's as high as they will go. We're tempting him with 100k and the chance for trophies.
Kid A said:Blue Haze said:Tron Coltrane said:Not trying to be adversarial here, even though I completely disagree, but who would you have us sign? Is that person going to be content with playing second fiddle to Zabba? And how much will they cost us?
I'm open to the idea there are better options than Sagna, I'm just stuck trying to think of one. Top 5 RB in the league this season and available for free.
Exactly
We can sign a younger player on lower wages, say 70k instead of 100k. He will have to be unproven to get wages that low. And even if we do, a difference of 30k over a 3-year contract is only 4.6m. The fee for a quality young right back will be at least 3x that. And good luck finding a young player willing to sit behind Zabaleta.
I confess that I haven't read all of this thread, but where has the idea that we are going to pay him £100K p/w come from? I know that that is what he reportedly wanted from Arsenal, but do we know for a fact that we have offered him that? Given our move toward incentive based contracts, I would have expected us to offer him significantly less than £100K, perhaps with a signing on fee and bonuses.
Very good player IMO, would be an excellent signing.
It's just a rumour, but reported in just about every article. Apparently he turned down 80k and Arsenal say that's as high as they will go. We're tempting him with 100k and the chance for trophies.
Re: Sagna
Fair enough but I would be amazed if we were offering that sort of wage to a back up RB of his age, particularly now that we have the FFP limitations to deal with. There are plenty of other reasons, financial and non financial, to choose us over Arsenal.
Blue Haze said:Kid A said:Blue Haze said:Exactly
We can sign a younger player on lower wages, say 70k instead of 100k. He will have to be unproven to get wages that low. And even if we do, a difference of 30k over a 3-year contract is only 4.6m. The fee for a quality young right back will be at least 3x that. And good luck finding a young player willing to sit behind Zabaleta.
I confess that I haven't read all of this thread, but where has the idea that we are going to pay him £100K p/w come from? I know that that is what he reportedly wanted from Arsenal, but do we know for a fact that we have offered him that? Given our move toward incentive based contracts, I would have expected us to offer him significantly less than £100K, perhaps with a signing on fee and bonuses.
Very good player IMO, would be an excellent signing.
It's just a rumour, but reported in just about every article. Apparently he turned down 80k and Arsenal say that's as high as they will go. We're tempting him with 100k and the chance for trophies.
Fair enough but I would be amazed if we were offering that sort of wage to a back up RB of his age, particularly now that we have the FFP limitations to deal with. There are plenty of other reasons, financial and non financial, to choose us over Arsenal.
Re: Sagna
He is on a free, how much would a similar player cost with his experience in the premier? You would be paying a fee of around 7m what we payed for Clichy plus wagers what wouldn't be less than 80k
Kid A said:Blue Haze said:Kid A said:I confess that I haven't read all of this thread, but where has the idea that we are going to pay him £100K p/w come from? I know that that is what he reportedly wanted from Arsenal, but do we know for a fact that we have offered him that? Given our move toward incentive based contracts, I would have expected us to offer him significantly less than £100K, perhaps with a signing on fee and bonuses.
Very good player IMO, would be an excellent signing.
It's just a rumour, but reported in just about every article. Apparently he turned down 80k and Arsenal say that's as high as they will go. We're tempting him with 100k and the chance for trophies.
Fair enough but I would be amazed if we were offering that sort of wage to a back up RB of his age, particularly now that we have the FFP limitations to deal with. There are plenty of other reasons, financial and non financial, to choose us over Arsenal.
He is on a free, how much would a similar player cost with his experience in the premier? You would be paying a fee of around 7m what we payed for Clichy plus wagers what wouldn't be less than 80k
Re: Sagna
100k a week for back up RB is too much imo.
meeesh said:It will be me a minimum of 100k a week,as he apparently turned down the new deal of 70k at Arsenal,that's the reason he's coming,and that reason only
100k a week for back up RB is too much imo.
meeesh
Well-Known Member
Re: Sagna
Agreed,and he aint much good neither
El Mago said:meeesh said:It will be me a minimum of 100k a week,as he apparently turned down the new deal of 70k at Arsenal,that's the reason he's coming,and that reason only
100k a week for back up RB is too much imo.
Agreed,and he aint much good neither
Davs 19
Well-Known Member
Re: Sagna
Are Clichy and Kola 'backups' ? Pellers would use Zab and Sagna in the same way.
Some of the thinking on here would make Shrek look like Einstein.
El Mago said:meeesh said:It will be me a minimum of 100k a week,as he apparently turned down the new deal of 70k at Arsenal,that's the reason he's coming,and that reason only
100k a week for back up RB is too much imo.
Are Clichy and Kola 'backups' ? Pellers would use Zab and Sagna in the same way.
Some of the thinking on here would make Shrek look like Einstein.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.