Platini Pollock
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 949
Ray78 said:
That is true.......but let's just say he will have a bigger contribution to arsenal than Sinclair will to us this season.....
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Santi Cazorla
- Thread starter Matt the Giant
- Start date
That is true.......but let's just say he will have a bigger contribution to arsenal than Sinclair will to us this season.....
jollylescott
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 May 2012
- Messages
- 10,652
Still can't fathom why we weren't in for him at that price.
Comrade Buka
Well-Known Member
jollylescott said:Still can't fathom why we weren't in for him at that price.
Because hindsight is 20/20.
FanchesterCity
Well-Known Member
He's in an good Arsenal team going through a bit of a purple patch.
That's no basis on which to judge a player.
He needs at least a season and probably two.
Does he look good? yes of course, but so many players look good 5-6 games a season.
That's no basis on which to judge a player.
He needs at least a season and probably two.
Does he look good? yes of course, but so many players look good 5-6 games a season.
jollylescott said:Still can't fathom why we weren't in for him at that price.
we didnt need him thats why. not as good as silva, and we've got nasri. plus it was 16m , not 12m as stated earlier in the thread
im sorry but i question our transfer policy at times .
for the price of sinclair and another 5 million we could have had this guy .
we will probably be linked with a 35 million swoop for him in the summer.
we were in for hazard , so when we didnt get him we should have been all over this guy . fucking obvious.<br /><br />-- Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:27 pm --<br /><br />
we didnt need him?
hahahahhahaha
you can never have too many good footballers.
we could have played nasri silva and cazorla behind aguero or tevez.
he would have improved us .
for the price of sinclair and another 5 million we could have had this guy .
we will probably be linked with a 35 million swoop for him in the summer.
we were in for hazard , so when we didnt get him we should have been all over this guy . fucking obvious.<br /><br />-- Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:27 pm --<br /><br />
dref619 said:jollylescott said:Still can't fathom why we weren't in for him at that price.
we didnt need him thats why. not as good as silva, and we've got nasri. plus it was 16m , not 12m as stated earlier in the thread
we didnt need him?
hahahahhahaha
you can never have too many good footballers.
we could have played nasri silva and cazorla behind aguero or tevez.
he would have improved us .
dref619 said:jollylescott said:Still can't fathom why we weren't in for him at that price.
we didnt need him thats why. not as good as silva, and we've got nasri. plus it was 16m , not 12m as stated earlier in the thread
Cazorla can play out on the wing just as well as he can as a playmaker. Would have been a top signing for us.
Tony Adcock said:Ray78 said:Still early to judge him.
That is true.......but let's just say he will have a bigger contribution to arsenal than Sinclair will to us this season.....
Maybe but Sinclair will become a valuable squad player.
sergiokun
Well-Known Member
bapi said:Great signing for Arsenal, their best player right now. And only 12M.
This