im sorry but i question our transfer policy at times .
for the price of sinclair and another 5 million we could have had this guy .
we will probably be linked with a 35 million swoop for him in the summer.
we were in for hazard , so when we didnt get him we should have been all over this guy . fucking obvious.
-- Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:27 pm --
dref619 said:
jollylescott said:
Still can't fathom why we weren't in for him at that price.
we didnt need him thats why. not as good as silva, and we've got nasri. plus it was 16m , not 12m as stated earlier in the thread
we didnt need him?
hahahahhahaha
you can never have too many good footballers.
we could have played nasri silva and cazorla behind aguero or tevez.
he would have improved us .