Save our Car-Wreck

Mad Eyed Screamer said:
When it came to the 50th anniversary of the Munich disaster, and City fans were being told by the media to behave ourselves during the minutes silence, MUFC "as a gesture and a mark of respect to City" requested the banner be taken down.
The following home game it was back up with the club's blessing. The club endorsed it and if it was taken down as a mark of respect for City, then it has to be viewed as a mark of disrespect to City when it went back up.
All this after City:
1.Backed the rags request to block Manchester Central's bid to join the Football League (they posed a serious threat to the rags).
2. Let the rags use Maine Road for a peppercorn rent, after the Luftwaffe bombed OT.
3. Let the rags use Maine Road for European games when OT didn't have floodlights.
Never forget.
Click to expand...
Hardly a big deal them having a banner it’s just all part of football rivalry. Made it all the sweater it coming down when we won the FA Cup and then overturned an 8 point gap to win the league on the final day with the last kick.

Talk about the respecting the the minute’s silence for the 50th anniversary of Munich actually does my head in. We only did what we should have done but there were plenty of hypocrites there that day. They didn’t make a sound during that but the same wankers could still be heard singing Munich at away games and on concourses after that.So basically they kept quiet because the club would have got absolutely slated if they’d made any noise. They weren’t really showing respect for the dead including one of our own legendary players.
 
Craig said:
Hardly a big deal them having a banner it’s just all part of football rivalry.
Click to expand...
Whether it's a big deal or not is down to the perception of the individual: some might see it as harmless (rag view), but most others see it as we did - and still do: as an act of needless provocation on the Pisscan's part. Because, let's be truthful here, that banner would not have been there if he had not wanted it there. It's on his shoulders and I believe everybody knows it.
The Pisscan has always been extremely vindictive and petty minded, and an act of such puerile immaturity could only come from someone so excessively competitive that an opportunity that might antagonise someone he sees as the enemy is grasped with both hands.

Over the years we have all seen signs of his petulance and his infantile tantrums when something happens that he has no control over: he resorts to irrational behaviour: he screams in the face of anyone who stands up to him, resorts to foul-mouthed intimidation and even physical violence if he doesn't get his way.

No two ways about it, that banner was there because the ayatollah Kim-Jong Pisscan wanted it there.
 
KentBlue said:
Whether it's a big deal or not is down to the perception of the individual: some might see it as harmless (rag view), but most others see it as we did - and still do: as an act of needless provocation on the Pisscan's part. Because, let's be truthful here, that banner would not have been there if he had not wanted it there. It's on his shoulders and I believe everybody knows it.
The Pisscan has always been extremely vindictive and petty minded, and an act of such puerile immaturity could only come from someone so excessively competitive that an opportunity that might antagonise someone he sees as the enemy is grasped with both hands.

Over the years we have all seen signs of his petulance and his infantile tantrums when something happens that he has no control over: he resorts to irrational behaviour: he screams in the face of anyone who stands up to him, resorts to foul-mouthed intimidation and even physical violence if he doesn't get his way.

No two ways about it, that banner was there because the ayatollah Kim-Jong Pisscan wanted it there.
Click to expand...
And nothing was more vindictive than recalling the rags that were on loan at Preston, when pisscan junior was sacked by North End.

Such a petty act that summed up the Govan bully to a tee.
 
KentBlue said:
Didn't they end up relegated because of this?
Click to expand...
Having done a bit of research (OK, googling) that appears to be the case.

The pisscan recalled the rags from PNE at the end of December 2010, and Preston was relegated from the second tier in April 2011.

Now whether the loss of said rags was a major contributing factor in their fall into the third tier is up for debate, but a more important issue was probably the shit job that pisscan junior must have done as the head coach.
 
KentBlue said:
Whether it's a big deal or not is down to the perception of the individual: some might see it as harmless (rag view), but most others see it as we did - and still do: as an act of needless provocation on the Pisscan's part. Because, let's be truthful here, that banner would not have been there if he had not wanted it there. It's on his shoulders and I believe everybody knows it.
The Pisscan has always been extremely vindictive and petty minded, and an act of such puerile immaturity could only come from someone so excessively competitive that an opportunity that might antagonise someone he sees as the enemy is grasped with both hands.

Over the years we have all seen signs of his petulance and his infantile tantrums when something happens that he has no control over: he resorts to irrational behaviour: he screams in the face of anyone who stands up to him, resorts to foul-mouthed intimidation and even physical violence if he doesn't get his way.

No two ways about it, that banner was there because the ayatollah Kim-Jong Pisscan wanted it there.
Click to expand...
Not in my lifetime
 
We should rename this thread, GTi.
Get Carrick in.
He's got the new manager bounce, won a few games, give him a 6 six year contract.
Then the rot will set back in.
Revert back to threads original name.
He'll be sacked before Xmas.
 
Ghostofmerlin said:
Oh, completely out of his depth, certainly. But that doesn't mean that united and he wouldn't both be dumb enough to make it happen.

I don't know who is available that wouldn't be out of their depth there, though. Klopp, probably. Pep for sure. Not a lot of viable options after that, though.

Edit- It appears Wilfried Nancy is available....
Click to expand...
Unless they win the CL without being in it any manager by Swamp standards would be classed as 'out of his depth'! I cannot think of any club which is more obnoxious nor can I think of any club getting anywhere near their level of entitlement and arrogance as the Rags. They are fed by the Rag obsessed media and swallow the hype without the need for seasoning.

Celtic, Forest 'n Palace played last night but the Beeb put the Ragettes as top billing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top