Scott Sinclair (continued)

[Daz_Blue]

Love the popcorn cat ....LEGEND

 

[sergiokun]

6.2 million is a good deal so if they want more leave him there and try someone else

 

[bluelol]

He's just tweeted this in reply to an enquiry

from a top source apparently. the blokes info is always spot on

Well I'm convinced.

Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Me too!!

 

[Stillsy]

6.2 take it or leave it you sheep shagging fuck heads.

Khaldoon we have a deal.

 

[Bald fraud]

Gotta love popcorn cat my new screensaver! :)

 

[RandomJ]

Only City could get held to ransom over a player who has refused to sign a contract, has a year left on his current one and has openly talked about leaving.

 

[levets]

I hate to say this but there seems to be a terrible lack of clarity of thought going on in this transfer window. Everyone knew that Sinclair was going to be a direct replacement for AJ so why leave ourselves so vulnerable by selling first. Can we now afford to play hardball over the price? I think we have gifted Swansea the initiative in the negotiations when a week ago we didn't need to buy (because we had AJ who still had years left on his contract), they had a player with less than 12 months left on his contract and they were in a weak position. Also, every time you switch targets this late in the window there is every chance it's going to be a false economy as you end up panic buying a player you never really wanted and get held to ransom as the selling club recognises you are desperate.

There have been quotes today that the fee "had been agreed" which leads me to think that the fee was agreed before the AJ sale and that the trumped up little fookin wannabees have gone back on their word and are acting like utter cockwombles
Make the coonts sweat - we will have other targets

thats it.... they had LFC pants down with Allen and now trying it with City

 

[jrb]

We need a Popcorn Cat banner at COMS.

 

[grim up north]

Only City could get held to ransom over a player who has refused to sign a contract, has a year left on his current one and has openly talked about leaving.

We want more money. City reply fuck off

 

[Ducado]

Only City could get held to ransom over a player who has refused to sign a contract, has a year left on his current one and has openly talked about leaving.

I don't think we are being held to ransom, this is how buisiness is carried out, if you think the seller is trying to fleece you, you walk away, if the seller really wants to do the deal he will come chasing you up the street, and that is the way it should be, although I happen to think the deal is done and dusted and this is just a show for the Swansea fans