Phuket Blue said:
I don't know if I wear premanent blue tinted specs or a lot of folks on here know F all about football.
ALL IN ALL I can't believe all the negativity surrounding Scott Sinclair. This is a guy who is only 23 and costs peanuts in today's world. He scored 8 goals and 4 assists for a mid table EPL and hardly missed a minute through injury. Then, admittedly in the Championship in the previous season, he scored 25+ goals! Yet AJ is supposed to be better with 6 goals and 2 assists, many of which were scored against exposed teams playing catch up.
It seems for many on here that unless it's a Hazzard or a Cavani, the guy isn't good enough for City!
It's not always the biggest names that help contribute to success over what will be a very long season. Mancini clearly sees that Sinclair can improve this team and I am more than happy to go along with his judgement.
1. 4 of those were penalties as he's their penalty taker. So you are right he hardly missed a minute last season and from open play he has 4 goals and 4 assists.
2. It says alot about football in England today when we consider 8 million pound as peanuts. It is alot of money for an average player who has one season in the PL and has 12 months left on his contract.
3. It doesnt have to be Hazard and Cavani(two players who has proved their ability for long time) for people to get excited. But at the same time for me the worst part is people who call out others if they dont rate a player City is linked with and basically use the argument of "so mancini rates him, you think you know more than him"
4. I bet you if we were linked with Steven Caldwell, some people would argue how good he is and how clueless you are if you dont rate him.
5. We are spoilt brats and we only want the best signings possible, and if that doesn't happen we will stomp our feet and go home.