pudge said:I don't understand what you mean?alky313 said:pudge said:If Mancini see's the need for a winger as a priority, then we could do better than Sinclair.
How many wingers would sit 28 league games regardless of Cup competitions with a pedigree better than Sinclair?
Players like Mertens, heck even Nani, and as has been said Dyer was better for Swansea last season (not saying we should go for him, just highlighting that he is in fact better than Sinclair) even Moses.WNRH said:pudge said:If Mancini see's the need for a winger as a priority, then we could do better than Sinclair.
Like who?
Even then, AJ isn't exactly much worse than him.
If he does sign I'l support him whole heartedly but you can't honestly think he's the best we can do?
A top class winger is going to cost you upwards of minimum £20m and high wages not to mention a long drawn out saga because it is us. Hazard and Sanchez have turned us down in the last year and now we need width desperately. We're not going to get that top class winger now because there are 8 days to go to the start of the season and 21 days left of the window which is why we are going for a cheaper option who can do a job and Scott Sinclair fits that bill.
I'll be very happy if we sign Sinclair and we have him and Johnson as wide options. They won't play in the top games but if we need a change of plan they can have an impact.