Sergio Aguero - 2016/17 performances

[Bewar3them00n]

Didn't seem much wrong with that so called "elbow" it was a physical tussle, thought he was just defending himself, and unintentionally caught him.

 

[kippax kid]

Its never a ban , even with the witch hunt , I think its still part of a 50/50 he fouled him and it was seen , ref is looking right at it..... So wipe your fannys .

 

[razman]

only way he gets away with it , if the ref says he saw it and was fine. Doubt it though...as others said easier to say .. I saw nothing

 

[kaz7]

Didn't seem much wrong with that so called "elbow" it was a physical tussle, thought he was just defending himself, and unintentionally caught him.

Replay from a different angle showed he didn't catch him at all

 

[quiet_riot]

1. Ref saw the incident
2. A free kick was given for the clash, not necessarily for the elbow mind but the physicality of it.

No FK given - we played on until their forward miscontrolled it out of play

 

[mancityscot]

would be very unlucky to be banne, dont feel the intent is there. hopefully the FA see that, but then again i wont hold my breath

 

[cookster]

No doubt Marriner will say he didn't see it. That will lead to a ban.

 

[kaz7]

We'll know tomorrow anyway as they meet on mondays usually

 

[marco]

Replay from a different angle showed he didn't catch him at all

dosnt matter,,''intent'' cant see him getting a ban though the bog brush does it week in week out but the pundits tell us he is lanky and has long arms which cause this so for him its ok

 

[Blue warrior]

Need to see the position off they ref to see if he can take the easy option of saying he never saw it. Looking at it through my beer goggles he never made contact but it's intent I suppose.